Leslie Moylan represents clients in complex litigation and appeals in federal and state courts, as well as before administrative agencies and in arbitration. Leslie has successfully litigated numerous cases to protect the rights of communications providers to deploy their networks and facilities – from local land use/zoning municipal agencies through the federal courts of appeals.
Leslie has litigated a wide variety of matters, including unfair and deceptive acts and practices claims; privacy claims; complex contract disputes; employment claims; and claims under the federal Communications Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2002 (FACTA). She has defended numerous class actions, and has recent and successful trial experience in both federal and state courts.
Defense of major national broadcasting and cable company
Defending cable operator in putative state class action alleging trespass in relation to the cable operator’s placement of its facilities. (S.C. Ongoing)
T-Mobile Central LLC v. Charter Township of West Bloomfield
Represented T-Mobile before 6th Circuit in successful challenge to local government denial of wireless tower application. In case of first impression for 6th Circuit, court established standard for "effective prohibition" claims under 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) and positively clarified standard for "substantial evidence" claims under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iii). Case resulted in court order for Township to issue permit granting tower application. 691 F.3d 794 (6th Cir. 2012)
National wireless and wireless infrastructure providers
Representing national wireless and wireless infrastructure providers in challenging municipal ordinances that inhibit the deployment of advanced communications services. (Ongoing)
National wireless carrier
Representing a national wireless carrier before various local governments on matters relating to local regulation of wireless facility siting. (Ongoing)
National wireless carrier
Representing a national wireless carrier in wireless siting litigation in various federal courts, challenging denial of client's wireless siting applications under Section 332(c)(7) of the federal Communications Act. (Ongoing)
Comcast v. NOVEC
Represented Comcast before the Virginia State Corporation Commission in case of first impression under amended state law requiring cooperative pole owner rents to be cost based and reasonable. (2014)
Pole attachment litigation before the Federal Communications Commission
Represented communications attachers in cases against utility pole owners related to imposition of construction standards in a manner that prevented communications attachers from deploying network.
Lopez et al. v. Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)
Successfully defended leading nonprofit advocacy group against alleged RICO violations before U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. (D.D.C., D.C. Cir., 2010) (Lopez v. CAIR, 741 F.Supp.2d. 222 (D.D.C., 2010))
Subpoena enforcement matters for national providers of broadband services
Multiple proceedings in state and federal courts for ISPs responding to, quashing or objecting to subpoenas for subscriber information.
Construction dispute for national homebuilder*
Representation of a national homebuilder in a lawsuit involving a large scale mixed-use development project.
Franchise agreements for worldwide lodging franchisor*
Representation of a worldwide lodging franchisor in several arbitration proceedings involving franchise agreements.
Litigation involving internet-based conferencing services provider*
Representation of a leading provider of hosted, real-time, Internet-based conferencing and collaboration services in a dispute involving the protection of its proprietary software.
* Denotes experience completed at a prior firm