Maria Browne advises clients in the areas of broadband and small cell deployment, communications regulation and licensing, telecommunications, accessibility, and information technology.
Maria provides compliance and strategic advice, negotiates infrastructure deals, and represents clients in disputed cases before the FCC and other federal, state and local regulatory bodies, and in court. She has appeared before state regulatory authorities in New Hampshire, New Jersey, Connecticut, New York, Washington, D.C., Vermont, Virginia, and Florida.
Maria's current and past clients include Armstrong Utilities, Briar Tek, Bright House Networks, Cablevision, Charter Communications, Comcast, Cox Communications, FCTA, Fibertech Networks, MetroCast, Mobilitie, NCTA, NECTA, Niitek, Time Warner Cable, T-Mobile and Troy Cablevision.
Advise clients regarding federal and state laws requiring accessible communications, information technology and video programming
Consult clients concerning federal and state laws requiring communications, information technology, websites, and video programming to be accessible to persons with disabilities, including the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, state disabilities laws, and FCC rules, including rules relating to advanced communications services, closed captioning and video description. (Ongoing)
Advise communications network providers regarding federal and state laws governing deployment of facilities on existing utility infrastructure
Negotiate pole attachment agreements with investor owned utilities, cooperatively and municipally owned power companies, and phone companies; review and analyze rates, terms and conditions of attachment; represent clients before the FCC and state public service commissions in regulatory matters and disputes concerning pole attachment rates, terms and conditions. (Ongoing)
Assist entities in filing Accessibility Compliance Certifications and establishing recordkeeping processes
Advises clients concerning the CVAA and FCC rules requiring communications providers to make services and equipment accessibility to persons with disabilities, to keep records concerning efforts to comply with rules, and annual compliance certification to the FCC. (Ongoing)
Defending complaints to FCC
Fending complaints to Federal Communications Commission. (Ongoing)
Duke Energy Indiana v. Comcast of Indianapolis, LLC
Defending Comcast in federal district court in Indiana in a suit relating to a dispute about pole attachment make-ready work. (Ongoing)
Represent clients in obtaining experimental licenses and special temporary authority to operate Part 15 devices. (Ongoing)
Procurement for cable operators and equipment manufacturers
Advise clients on state and federal procurement requirements. (Ongoing)
Represent clients in negotiations with state and local regulators
Review and negotiate state and local franchise agreements, infrastructure deployment terms, and ROW usage terms and conditions. Advise clients concerning rights to occupy public ROW and private easements, and limitations on local regulatory authority. (Ongoing)
Various cable companies and telecommunications service providers
Assist clients in filing certifications to FCC concerning FCC record keeping requirements governing telecommunications and advanced communications service accessibility. (Ongoing)
Cox Communications Hampton Roads, LLC v. Dominion Virginia Power
Represented Cox before the Federal Communications Commission in case related to Section 224(i) of the Communications Act. (2015)
Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc. v. NV Energy, Inc.
Represented Cox before the Federal Communications Commission in a case related to NVE’s imposition of Grade B construction standards in a manner that prevents Cox from deploying network until after existing Grade C poles are upgraded. (2015)
CL&P pole attachment rate case
Represented New England Cable Television Association in case before the Connecticut Public Utility Regulatory Authority concerning CL&P’s pole attachment rental rates. (2014)
Comcast v. NOVEC
Represented Comcast before the Virginia State Corporation Commission in case of first impression under amended state law requiring cooperative pole owner rents to be cost based and reasonable. (2014)
Gulf Power Company v. Comcast of the South, Inc.
Defended Comcast against Gulf Power claims relating to back rent owed based upon pole attachment audit. (2014)
Various cable companies
Filed comments in FCC CG Docket No. 05-231, In the Matter of Closed Captioning of Video Programming, on behalf of Charter, Cablevision, Mediacom, Suddenlink and Time Warner Cable. (2014)
Fibertech Networks v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company
Represented Fibertech Networks before the Federal Communications Commission in a case challenging BGE’s imposition of Grade B construction standards in a manner that prevented Fibertech Networks from deploying network until after existing Grade C poles were upgraded. (2013)
Fibertech Networks v. Verizon New England and the Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid
Represented Fibertech Networks in matter related to pole owners’ failure to provide timely access to poles and particularly addressing pole attachment make-ready timeframes and temporary construction techniques. (2012)
New Hampshire Public Utility Commission proceeding for Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Represented cable operator client in dispute before the PUC concerning the appropriate amount of Public Service Company of New Hampshire pole attachment rental rates. (2012)
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities proceeding for Fibertech Networks
Represented Fibertech Networks in case against Verizon concerning Verizon charges for make-ready work in connection with pole attachments. (2012)
Connecticut proceeding for New England Cable Television Association
Consulting and developing testimony and related filings in Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control proceeding regarding Connecticut Light and Power proposed pole attachment rental rate increase and new terms and conditions of attachment, and negotiating interim pole attachment agreement to govern until final agreement adopted in proceeding. (2011)
Virginia State Corporation Commission pole attachment proceeding
Represented cable operator in proceeding before the Virginia State Corporation Commission concerning the appropriate formula for calculating pole attachment rental rates for electric cooperative pole owners. (2011)
Armstrong Utilities, Inc. v. United Telephone Company of Pennsylvania d/b/a Embarq Pennsylvania
Represented Armstrong in matter relating to denial of access to poles. (2008)
Fibertech Networks v. Verizon Maryland Inc. and Potomac Electric Power Company
Represented Fibertech Networks in matter related to pole owners failure to provide timely access to pole (2008)
Pole attachments for Florida Cable Telecommunications Association Inc.
Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) rulemaking and related proceedings concerning electric utility storm hardening plans. Successfully limited PSC oversight of the standards and procedures governing third-party attachments to utility poles. (2008)
New York proceeding governing pole attachments
Participated in cross industry workshops leading to 2004 Order governing pole attachment terms and conditions for the state of New York. (2004)