|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Google’s Annual Revenues
- 2002: $439,508,000
- 2003: $1,465,934,000
- 2004: $3,189,223,000
- Yahoo’s Annual Revenues
- 2002: $953,067,000
- 2003: $1,625,934,000
- 2004: $3,574,517,000
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Where a webpage appears in a list of search results has a huge impact on
how many Internet users visit that page.
- Most end users rarely look beyond the second page of search results.
- In the late 1990’s, websites began using Search Engine Optimization
(“SEO”) strategies designed to manipulate search engines into ranking
their sites higher in response to certain searches.
|
|
6
|
- Early search algorithms were easily manipulated because they only looked
at the content on webpage, such as metatags.
- Many search algorithms now take into account the webpages most clicked
on in response to the same or similar searches.
- Algorithms also evaluate how many other websites link to a given
webpage, and rank the page higher if more links exist.
|
|
7
|
- Advertisers pay to have their websites displayed on results pages in
response to searches for certain keywords.
- Most search engines use a bidding system for purchasing popular keywords
and phrases.
- Advertisers also bid to receive a higher ranking (usually somewhere in
the top five results) or bid to obtain a particular placement on the
results page, such as above or to the right of the search results.
|
|
8
|
- “Paid Inclusion” is where advertisers pay a fixed amount each time their
website is listed on a results page.
- “Pay-Per-Click,” the most common model used today, is where advertisers
pay each time a user clicks through to the advertiser’s website from the
results page.
- Google’s minimum price for a paid click is $.05, while the most
sought-after keywords can cost $100 per click.
- Some search engines are now using pricing models where advertisers pay
based on the “conversion rate,” or the frequency that users purchase
something from the advertiser’s website (each being a “conversion”)
after clicking through to the website from a results page.
|
|
9
|
- Search engines, especially Google and Yahoo, increase their revenues by
syndicating their search results and search functionality to other
websites or software.
- For example, all searches done through AOL utilize Google’s search
engine. So a search made from www.aol.com
will display a private-label version of Google’s search results that
matches AOL’s website.
- Search engines then share the advertising revenue generated from such
Internet traffic with the syndicated website or software maker.
|
|
10
|
- Primary Issue: Should advertisers
be able to purchase keywords that are the same or similar to their
competitors’ trademarks?
- Secondary Issue: Should search engines have a duty to monitor and refuse
to sell or stop selling keywords that might also be trademarks?
|
|
11
|
- Traditional likelihood of confusion analysis is not applicable to
keyword advertising because search engine users typically are not
confused as to the source of goods or services listed in the search
results.
- Specifically, when presented with a list of search results, users are
not confused that a website belonging to a competitor of the trademark
owner is that of the trademark owner.
- Instead, “initial interest confusion” applies.
|
|
12
|
- Courts have applied the “initial interest confusion” analysis from the Brookfield
Communications case in finding that search engines’ and advertisers’ use
of keywords may infringe. Playboy
Enters., Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp., 354 F.3d 1020 (9th
Cir. 2004).
- Initial interest confusion occurs when a consumer initially is seeking
the trademark owner’s goods or services but is somehow diverted to the
infringer’s goods and services prior to reaching the trademark owner.
- Courts may still find trademark infringement under this theory even
though the consumer is not confused that the infringer’s goods and
services are different from those of the trademark owner.
|
|
13
|
- In Playboy Enterprises, the court found that Netscape’s placement of
adult-oriented banner ads on search results pages in response to
searches for “playboy” could result in initial interest confusion.
- By failing to sufficiently distinguish the banner ads from the result
listing for Playboy’s website, the 9th Circuit found that
consumers might be diverted to such other websites by improperly using
the goodwill associated with the PLAYBOY mark.
- From a policy standpoint, initial interest confusion is more about
protecting trademark owners, not consumers, from the effect of the
infringing activity.
|
|
14
|
- Search engines have argued that displaying ads in response to
trademarked keywords does not constitute a “use in commerce” of such
trade-marked terms actionable under the Lanham Act.
- The rationale is that, when “used” as a keyword, the trademarked term is
not being used as a source identifier.
That is, it is not being used to deceive the user into believing
the advertiser’s goods or services are those of the trademark owner.
- The courts are currently split on this issue.
|
|
15
|
- Fraudulent clicks are a phenomenon that has grown out of pay-per-click
advertising.
- A “fraudulent click” occurs when someone (an individual or, more likely,
a software program) clicks on an advertiser’s link for an some motive
other than a bona fide interest in the advertiser’s site or products.
- The problem is that usually the advertiser still has to pay the search
engine for the fraudulent click even though it received no benefit from
the person or software clicking through to its website.
|
|
16
|
- Click fraud may result from someone deliberately trying to increase a
competitor’s advertising fees by clicking on their paid links
repeatedly.
- A more serious source of paid clicks come from syndication partners of
search engines having automated software run searches and click on
results to increase the advertising fees generated by their websites.
- Click fraud is a serious problem for the search engine industry, as some
estimate that click fraud may account for as many as 20% of all clicks
on search-based ads.
|
|
17
|
- The first class action lawsuit over click-fraud was filed in February
against the major search engines in Texarkana, Arkansas.
- The lawsuit named most major search engines, including Yahoo, Google,
AOL, Ask Jeeves, Lycos, Looksmart and Findwhat.com.
- The plaintiffs’ main allegation was that the search engines knowingly
overcharged for advertisements resulting from click fraud.
|