Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Practice Areas - advisory bulletins
Home

Practice Areas - Business Transactions

 

Legal Services

Related Practice Areas

Advisory Bulletins

Links & Resources

Search

 
News to Use
Recruiting
DWT in the Community
Seminars & Training
Bookstore
Lawyer Directory
Office Locations
Search & Site Map

New Advisory Bulletins

SEC Simplifies Form D and Requires Electronic FilingSEC Simplifies Form D and Requires Electronic Filing [Feb. 2008]


By Stuart C. Campbell
and Michele L. Buck-Romero


On Feb. 6, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule adopting revisions to Form D effective Sept. 15, 2008, and requiring electronic filing of Form D as of March 16, 2009. Any company issuing securities pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation D should be aware of this new rule. The rule amendments are intended to ease the burdens of complying with Form D, facilitate electronic filing, improve and update Form D information requirements, and increase the public’s access to Form D information.

Under the Securities Act of 1933, an offer to sell securities must either be registered with the SEC or fall within an exemption from the registration requirements, such as the offering exemptions under Rules 504, 505 and 506 of Regulation D. A company relying upon a Regulation D exemption currently must file a Form D with the SEC in paper format no later than 15 days after the first sale of securities in the offering. Form D serves as the official notice of an exempt offering under Regulation D and includes basic information about the issuer and the offering.


2008 Compensation Disclosure & Analysis: Adherence to New Guidance Critical [Jan 2008]

By Ryan York and Matt Larson

On Oct. 9 2007, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff released additional guidance on Compensation Disclosure & Analysis (CD&A) disclosures that will affect many public companies as they prepare 2008 annual reports and proxy statements. We want to remind those affected by the guidance that the SEC expects registrants to incorporate it in 2008.

All companies that have a class of securities registered under Securities Exchange Act Section 12, or that are required to file reports under Exchange Act Section 15(d), are affected. We remind you to be certain that CD&A disclosures in your annual report and proxy include better analysis, are written in “plain English” and meet the SEC staff's disclosure standards for performance targets, benchmarks and change-in-control agreements.

We recommend that you review the SEC's Oct. 9, 2007 guidance (available here) as well as Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K well in advance of this year's deadlines for filing your annual report and distributing your proxy statement.

read bulletin


Regulatory Relief for Private Company Stock Option Plans: SEC simplifies reporting requirements for certain plans
[Jan 2008]

By Marcus Williams

Effective Dec. 7, 2007 the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted a rule making it easier for larger private companies to use certain types of compensatory stock option plans. The rule exempts such plans of qualifying non-reporting companies from Exchange Act registration.

The exemption under the SEC's new Rule 12h-1(f) affects private companies with more than $10 million in assets that have a class of equity securities, with stock options treated as a separate class, held by more than 500 persons. The rule also will impact certain subsidiaries of public companies.

Qualifying companies with stock option plans may reduce their compliance burden by ensuring their plans are properly structured. Qualifying companies that would like to establish stock option plans now have a clear path to doing so with greatly reduced regulatory obligations.

read bulletin


Implementing the Amendments to SEC Rule 144: Shorter holding periods, fewer restrictions on shareholder resales
[Jan 2008]

By Marcus Williams

On Feb. 15, 2008, newly adopted amendments to Securities Act Rule 144, which governs private resales of restricted securities between qualified institutional buyers, will go into effect, allowing institutional shareholders of both public and private companies to resell shares without registration. The amendments to Rule 144 were adopted in order to simplify compliance with the rule and to further facilitate resales, in order to promote efficiency of the capital markets. The amendments apply both to affiliate and non-affiliate shareholders, albeit in slightly different ways. Following are the most important aspects of the amendments.

read bulletin


Articles & Publications

Inside Entrepreneurship: Avoid Missteps When You Incorporate

Seattle Post-Intelligencer [ 9/20/07] read article

Once upon a time, Sonny, we had Seafirst Bank... by Sandra Gallagher-Alford
[reprinted with permission from the Puget Sound Business Journal] read article


 

Email Notification Service

Laws are constantly changing. Fortunately, our lawyers are watching the legal developments that can affect your business. We regularly publish articles, advisory bulletins, and guides on legal developments that are of interest to you. Our publications are available free of charge by email and are posted on our website. To sign up for our Advisory Bulletin email service, click here.

Corporate Finance Law Blog

Previous Advisory Bulletin Archive

Rules for Foreign Private Issuer De-Registration: A Regulatory Gift as Sarbanes-Oxley Turns 5 Years Old [June 2007] read bulletin

SEC Proposes Changes to the Definition of "Accredited Investor" [March 2007] read bulletin

NASDAQ announces new Global Select Market for listing of its largest companies [Feb. 2006]
read bulletin SEC Issues Proposed “Notice and Access” Rules Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials [Jan. 2006] read bulletin

read more advisory bulletins


Related Advisory Bulletins

Employee Benefits

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Home | Practice Areas | News To Use | Recruiting | DWT in the Community
Seminars & Training | Bookstore | Lawyer Directory | Office Locations | Search & Site Map
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Davis Wright Tremaine LLP