Immigration Law Advisory Bulletin
Federal Judge Blocks Enforcement of New
Immigration Rule on “No-Match” Letters
By Minh
Phung Ngo and Richard
M. Rawson
[October 2007]
A federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction
blocking enforcement of a Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
rule that established "safe harbor" procedures for employers
to follow in response to a “no-match” letter from the
Social Security Administration (SSA). The new rule was adopted on
Aug. 14, 2007 and was scheduled to take effect on Sept. 14, 2007
(see previous
DWT advisory), but on Aug. 29, a consortium of unions
and business groups filed a lawsuit challenging the validity of
the rule. In a 22-page decision dated Oct. 10, 2007, the judge concluded
that serious issues had been raised about the validity of the new
rule, and that a preliminary injunction was warranted to prevent
irreparable harm pending a final decision by the court.
Prior to the injunction, the SSA was prepared to send
out 140,000 no-match letters affecting more than eight million workers.
Implementation of the new "safe harbor" procedures would
have forced employers to terminate employees who could not resolve
a no-match issue or who could not re-verify their employment authorization
within 93 days after receipt of the no-match letter.
It is expected that the SSA will now issue no-match
letters without reference to the new "safe harbor" procedures,
and employers are advised to follow the instructions in the SSA
letters and to not implement the "safe harbor" procedures
unless and until the injunction has been lifted. However, employers
are reminded that if they have actual knowledge that an employee
is not authorized to work, (e.g., if the employee confesses to being
illegal in response to a no-match letter), then the employer must
terminate that employee or face fines for knowingly continuing to
employ an unauthorized alien.
If you have questions
or would like more information, please contact any member of DWT's
immigration practice team, including:
This
advisory
is a publication of the Employer Services Department of Davis Wright
Tremaine LLP. Our purpose in publishing this advisory
is to inform our clients and friends of recent developments in employment
law. It is not intended, nor should it be used, as a substitute
for specific legal advice as legal counsel may be given only in
response to inquiries regarding particular situations. Attorney
advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Copyright © 2007, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
return to Advisory Bulletins main page |