| 
Federal Judge Blocks Enforcement
of New Immigration Rule on “No-Match” Letters
By Minh
Phung Ngo and Richard
M. Rawson
[October 2007]
A federal judge has granted a preliminary
injunction blocking enforcement of a Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) rule that established "safe harbor" procedures
for employers to follow in response to a “no-match”
letter from the Social Security Administration (SSA). The new
rule was adopted on Aug. 14, 2007 and was scheduled to take
effect on Sept. 14, 2007 (see previous
DWT advisory), but on Aug. 29, a consortium of unions
and business groups filed a lawsuit challenging the validity
of the rule. In a 22-page decision dated Oct. 10, 2007, the
judge concluded that serious issues had been raised about the
validity of the new rule, and that a preliminary injunction
was warranted to prevent irreparable harm pending a final decision
by the court.
Prior to the injunction, the SSA was prepared
to send out 140,000 no-match letters affecting more than eight
million workers. Implementation of the new "safe harbor" procedures
would have forced employers to terminate employees who could
not resolve a no-match issue or who could not re-verify their
employment authorization within 93 days after receipt of the
no-match letter.
It is expected that the SSA will now issue no-match
letters without reference to the new "safe harbor" procedures,
and employers are advised to follow the instructions in the
SSA letters and to not implement the "safe harbor" procedures
unless and until the injunction has been lifted. However, employers
are reminded that if they have actual knowledge that an employee
is not authorized to work, (e.g., if the employee confesses
to being illegal in response to a no-match letter), then the
employer must terminate that employee or face fines for knowingly
continuing to employ an unauthorized alien.
If you have questions
or would like more information, please contact any member of
DWT's immigration practice team, including:
This
advisory
is a publication of the Employer Services Department of Davis
Wright Tremaine LLP. Our purpose in publishing this advisory
is to inform our clients and friends of recent developments
in employment law. It is not intended, nor should it be used,
as a substitute for specific legal advice as legal counsel may
be given only in response to inquiries regarding particular
situations.
Copyright
© 2007, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
return to Advisory
Bulletins main page |