| 
IRS Guidance Clarifies That Tax-Exempt
Hospitals May Share Health Information Technology With Physicians1
By Susan
Schalla and LaVerne
Woods
[May 2007]
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
issued guidance on May 11, 2007 that should allow tax-exempt
hospitals to proceed with plans to share certain health information
technology (HIT) with physicians. Widespread adoption of electronic
health record (EHR) technology has become a national policy
priority in recent years, and many nonprofit hospitals qualified
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code wish to
provide a financial incentive to allow physicians to acquire
HIT and connect to the hospitals’ EHR systems. Until recently,
however, both federal health law regulations and rules for tax-exempt
organizations presented hurdles. The U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) removed the health law hurdles when
it published anti-kickback safe harbors and Stark regulatory
exceptions, effective October 2006, allowing permitted organizations
to share the cost of certain HIT and related services with referral
sources. A full description of the final HHS regulations is
set forth in our August
2006 advisory bulletin.
After the HHS regulations became effective, federal
income tax questions remained for the tax-exempt hospitals,
including whether the proposed transfers could give rise to
private benefit, inurement and intermediate sanctions issues,
as described in our February
2007 advisory bulletin. The recent IRS guidance, in the
form of an internal memorandum issued by the Exempt Organizations
Director, largely removes the federal income tax obstacles to
clear the way for HIT subsidy arrangements between tax-exempt
hospitals and their medical staff physicians.
The IRS guidance states that the IRS will not
treat the benefits that a tax-exempt hospital, qualified under
Section 501(c)(3), provides to its medical staff physicians
as impermissible private benefit or inurement as long as the
benefits fall within the range of HIT and related services permissible
under the HHS regulations. In addition, the hospital’s
arrangement to provide HIT and related services to physicians
at a discount must meet certain criteria:
- The HIT subsidy arrangement must require both the hospital
and the participating physicians to comply with the HHS regulations
on a continuing basis.
- The arrangement must provide that, to the extent permitted
by law, the hospital may access all of the electronic medical
records that the physician creates using the HIT and related
services subsidized by the hospital.
- The hospital must ensure that the HIT and related services
are available to all of its medical staff physicians.
- The hospital must provide the same level of subsidy to all
of its medical staff physicians, or otherwise vary the level
of subsidy by applying criteria related to meeting the healthcare
needs of the community.
Remaining Issue: Taxable Income to the
Physician-Recipient?
The IRS guidance does not address the issue of
whether the hospital's subsidy to the physicians, under conditions
consistent with the HHS regulations, will constitute taxable
income to the physician-recipient. It is unclear when or if
the IRS will issue further guidance addressing this issue. If
the value provided by the hospital constitutes taxable income
to the physician, it could impede the dissemination of EHR technology,
despite the resolution of other health and tax law issues.
Footnote
1
This advisory was not intended or written
to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding
penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law. Under these
rules, a taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal
tax penalties only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive
tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements under federal
law.
For more information, please contact:
This advisory
is a publication of the Health Law and Tax-Exempt Organizations
Groups of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. Our purpose in publishing
this advisory is to inform our clients and friends of recent
legal developments. It is not intended, nor should it be used,
as a substitute for specific legal advice as legal counsel may
only be given in response to inquiries regarding particular
situations.
Copyright 2007, Davis Wright Tremaine
LLP.
return to Advisory Bulletins main page
|