| 
The 2003 Medicare Prescription Drug, “Improvement”
and Modernization Act Provides Increased Revenue Opportunities
By
Lisa Rediger Hayward and Susan L. Fine
[December 2003]
Signed into law on Dec. 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act, P.L. 108-173 (the “Act”),
with close to 200 major sections, has been called the largest
overhaul to the Medicare Program since its inception. The Act
not only creates a historic prescription drug benefit, but makes
significant payment changes to Medicare Part A and Part B, and
Medicaid. Congress has hailed the Act as correcting existing
payment “inequities.” Although rural providers and
teaching hospitals are among the big winners, and durable medical
equipment (DME) and drug suppliers potentially among those expected
to suffer the most losses, the payment provisions contain increased
revenue opportunities for hospitals, physicians, and other providers.
For hospitals, increased revenue opportunities exist in the
following:
- inpatient PPS update;
- short-term bump in IME reimbursement through 2006;
- GME FTE opportunities for geriatric and family practice
programs;
- one-time moratorium on the financial arrangement requirement
for supervision of residents at non-hospital settings;
- ability to apply for an increased GME FTE limit;
- expanded coverage of device trials;
- reduction in thresholds to qualify for the new technology
add-on payment; and
- expanded opportunities for wage index reclassifications.
Hospitals may experience reductions in reimbursement for certain
covered outpatient drugs, while other drugs may more easily
qualify for separate outpatient ambulatory payment classification
(APC) payment. For rural providers, the Act provides for numerous
protections and opportunities for revenue enhancements, including
extensions to hospital outpatient prospective payment system
(OPPS) hold harmless, wage index reclassifications, increased
disproportionate share (DSH) payments, and increased reimbursement
for Critical Access Hospitals. Skilled nursing facilities (SNF)
will see significant increases in payments for services to patients
with AIDS.
For physicians, increased revenue opportunities include:
- update to the physician fee schedule;
- coverage of initial physical examinations;
- coverage of certain screening tests for cardiovascular disease
and diabetes; and
- physician scarcity 5 percent bonus payments for 2005-2007.
Increased reimbursement is also available for screening mammography
services, and beginning in 2005 for diagnostic mammography services,
furnished in a hospital outpatient department. Outpatient physical
and occupational therapy providers benefit from the two-year
moratorium on the therapy cap.
DME suppliers will see their reimbursement rates frozen through
2008 for most items and services. In addition, reimbursement
will decrease for selected items such as oxygen, oxygen equipment,
wheelchairs, nebulizers, diabetic supplies, hospital beds, and
air mattresses. Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) facilities
will also see a reduction in payments beginning in April 2004,
with rates then frozen while the General Accounting Office (GAO)
conducts a study to determine how to re-vamp the ASC reimbursement
system.
To determine whether the changes help or hurt the bottom line,
providers are scrambling to make sense of the rules. While some
Congressional mandates are quite clear, others remain subject
to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance
and implementation. Ambitiously, and quite unrealistically,
Congress has set implementation dates for many provisions in
2004, some as early as January. Congress has already imposed
a deadline of Feb. 15, 2004 for providers to apply for one of
the wage index opportunities. We expect to see a flood of CMS
program issuances in the first quarter of 2004.
To help our clients evaluate how they fare under the new rules
and how to take advantage of the available revenue enhancement
opportunities, we have summarized the key payment provisions
below, organized by issue and divided into sections for Medicare
Part A and Part B. We have indicated the changes likely to result
in significantly increased reimbursement, as well as those likely
to have significant negative reimbursement impacts.
SUMMARY OF KEY PAYMENT CHANGES RESULTING FROM THE 2003 MEDICARE
BILL
| ISSUE |
LEGISLATIVE CHANGE |
| PART A |
| Inpatient PPS Payment |
The hospital inpatient prospective payment (IPPS) to acute
care hospitals is a payment per discharge based on a specific
diagnosis and assignment to a Diagnostic Related Group (DRG).
The Act extends the full market basket update to the PPS
payment for all hospitals, but for 2005-2007, there is a
0.4 percent reduction for hospitals that do not provide
quality reporting data pursuant to CMS’s Hospital
Quality Initiative in a given year. The required data is
based on a set of 10 quality indicators established by the
Secretary as of Nov. 1, 2003. The reduction in one year
does not carry over to the next year. (§501)
For non-urban hospitals, the Act permanently maintains
the increase in the “standardized amount”
previously applied only to large urban hospitals. (§401)
The PPS payment is determined by the following formula:
DRG weight X Standardized Amount. The “standardized
amount” is a dollar amount that represents the average
allowable operating cost per discharge, and consists of
two components: labor and non-labor. Section 401 of the
Act serves to reduce the disparity in payments between
rural and urban hospitals. (Above change is expected
to have a significant positive reimbursement impact.)
|
| IPP Wage Index Adjustments |
The Act reduces the labor share portion of the standardized
amount from 71 percent to 62 percent for hospitals with
a wage index of less than 1.0 for discharges on or after
Oct. 1, 2004. (§403) The labor share of the standardized
amount is adjusted by the “wage index,” which
accounts for variations in area hospital labor costs. The
reduction in the labor share will reduce the impact of the
wage index, thus increase the PPS payment for hospitals
in low wage areas.
The Act creates further opportunities for low wage area
hospitals to increase their PPS payments by expanding
availability of wage index geographic classifications
to hospitals if a certain number of hospital employees
migrate out of the county to work in a neighboring county
with a higher wage index, referred to as the “commuting”
adjustment. The Secretary has discretion to determine
criteria for the out-migrating county and the minimum
out-migration threshold (which cannot be less than 10
percent). The increase in the wage index shall be based
on the percentage of the hospital employees residing in
the qualifying county who are employed in any higher wage
index area. The increase shall be effective for 3 years,
unless waived by the hospital. A hospital with this wage
index adjustment may not be eligible for other reclassifications.
(§505)
The Act calls for the creation of a one-time opportunity
for a wage index reclassification for those hospitals
unable to qualify under existing criteria (CMS to determine
criteria by Jan. 1, 2004, and hospital must apply by Feb.
15, 2004). (§§505, 508)
(Above changes are expected to have significant positive
reimbursement impacts.) |
| IME/GME |
Effective for discharges occurring on or after April 1,
2004, the act increases the current IME education adjustment
factor (a component of the IME payment formula) from 1.35
to 1.47 for the last half of fiscal year 2004, 1.42 for
2005, 1.37 for 2006, 1.32 for 2007, and 1.35 thereafter.
(§502) (Above change is expected to have a significant
positive reimbursement impact.) For family practice
residents in programs in existence as of Jan. 1, 2002,
the Act provides for a 1-year moratorium (for 2004) on
a portion of the requirement that hospitals incur all
or substantially all of the costs of training in a non-hospital
site. The Act provides that the “Secretary shall
allow all hospitals to count residents in osteopathic
and allopathic family practice programs … who are
training at non-hospital sites, without regard to the
financial arrangement between the hospital and the teaching
physician practicing in the non-hospital site to which
the resident has been assigned.” (§713); this
appears primarily intended to permit hospitals to count
FTEs at non-hospitals sites where the supervisors are
volunteering their time.
For geriatric specialty residents or fellows, the Act
provides for an exception to the GME rule that reduces
an FTE by 50 percent for the years the resident/fellow
exceeds the minimum number of years required for board
eligibility (or five years, which ever is less) for programs
that require two years of training to become board eligible
in a geriatric specialty. (§712)
The Act provides for a “redistribution” of
FTEs and adjustment of 1996 FTE limits, which essentially
reduces the resident limit for hospitals with FTE counts
below their limits and redistributes those FTE slots to
other hospitals for the purpose of increasing the resident
limit. If a hospital’s “reference resident
level,” which is defined as the total number of
FTEs before the application of the weighting factor in
the fields of allopathic and osteopathic medicine (for
the most recent cost reporting period ending on or before
Sept. 30, 2002) is less than the resident limit, then,
effective July 1, 2005, the applicable resident limit
shall be reduced by 75 percent of the difference between
the applicable resident limit and the reference resident
level. At the same time, other hospitals may apply to
increase their resident limits, but the aggregate increase
in residents may not exceed the Secretary’s “estimate
of the aggregate reduction” in the limits. The Act
does not specify criteria to qualify for the increase,
so it is not clear which hospitals are eligible to increase
their limits, but the Act requires the Secretary to take
into account “the demonstrated likelihood of the
hospital filling the positions within the first three
cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2005”
and to give priority first to hospitals located in rural
areas, then to hospitals in urban areas that are not large
urban areas, then to residency training programs in a
specialty for which there are no other programs in the
state. No one hospital may increase their limit by more
than 25 FTEs. (§422)
The Act Eliminates the GME FTE per resident amount update
of CPI minus two for hospitals with high-cost residency
programs (140 percent above the geographically adjusted
national average) through 2013. (§711) |
| DSH |
The Act equalizes DSH payments among hospitals by applying
the payment adjustment formula applicable to urban hospitals
to all 100-bed or larger hospitals for discharges occurring
on and after April 1, 2004. (§402) To determine whether
this helps or hurts hospitals, they should perform their
computations under the current formula and under the new
formula.
For rural hospitals (except rural referral centers) and
urban hospitals with less than 100 beds, the payment adjustment
percentage is capped at 12 percent, up from 5.25 percent;
this could double DSH payments for small hospitals that
have high DSH patient percentages that were penalized
under the old cap. (§402)
(Above changes are expected to have significant positive
reimbursement impacts.) |
| Research & Technology |
The Act extends coverage of routine costs associated with
“qualifying” clinical trials to trial of Category
A (experimental/investigational) devices if certain conditions
are met. (§731) One of the criteria for a qualifying
clinical trial is that the device “has been determined
by The Secretary” to be “intended for use in
the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of an immediately
life-threatening disease or condition.” Establishes
a lower formula threshold for determining whether the
DRG rate for a new technology is “inadequate”
before a supplemental payment is available. (§503) |
| Critical Access Hospitals |
The Act eases the qualifying bed limitation by permitting
a hospital to qualify as a Critical Access Hospital (CAH)
if it has up to 25 acute care beds (up from 15); in addition,
CAHs may operate up to 10 distinct part psychiatric and
rehabilitation unit beds without counting the beds toward
the bed limit (not clear whether the psych and rehab unit
bed limit is a total of 10, or 10 for each kind of distinct
unit). This change will likely make it easier for hospitals
to qualify and will allow them to operate psych and rehab
beds without concern that it will jeopardize their CAH status.
(§405)
The Act increases reimbursement rates for inpatient,
outpatient, and skilled nursing facility services furnished
by CAHs up to 101 percent of reasonable
costs, effective for services furnished during cost reporting
periods beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2004. (§405)
The Act expands reimbursement of costs incurred for on-call
emergency room services to such services furnished by
physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and clinical
nurse specialists, as well as physicians, beginning for
costs incurred on or after Jan. 1, 2005. (§405)
(Above changes are expected to have significant positive
reimbursement impacts.) |
| Low-Volume Hospital Supplemental Payment |
The Act makes a supplemental payment available (amount
to be determined by the Secretary) for PPS hospitals with
less than 800 discharges in a given fiscal year (beginning
with 2005) and located more than 25 miles from another PPS
hospital. The Act defines “discharge” as “an
inpatient acute care discharge … regardless of whether
the individual is entitled to benefits under Part A.”
(§406) |
| SNF Services to Residents with AIDS |
Effective for services furnished on or after 10/1/04,
the act increases the per diem payment rate by 128 percent
for any SNF providing Part A covered services to AIDS residents.
(§511) (Above changes are expected to have significant
positive reimbursement impacts.) |
| SNF Services Provided by RHCs & FQHCs |
Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Center
Services providing skilled nursing facility services are
excluded from the PPS payment system for skilled nursing
facilities for services furnished on or after Jan. 1, 2005.
(§410) |
| PART B |
| Physician Fee Schedule |
The conversion factor (the dollar amount that when multiplied
by the relative value unit (RVU) for a given service yields
the Medicare payment amount) for the physician fee schedule
will increase by 1.5 percent for calendar years
2004 and 2005. Thus, the 4.5 percent cut that was scheduled
to take effect in 2004 and the additional cut scheduled
to take place in 2005 have been blocked. (§ 601)
For physician services furnished in Alaska between Jan.
1, 2004 and Dec. 31, 2005, the Act establishes a floor
of 1.67 percent for practice expense, malpractice and
work geographic indices.
Increases drug administration portion of fee schedule
payments. (§303) (This offsets the reduction in payments
to physicians for drugs furnished to beneficiaries.) |
| Rural Physicians |
Establishes a floor at 1.0 for the work geographic index
for services furnished between January 1, 2004 and January
1, 2007. This provision will provide some relief for those
physicians, not just rural physicians, whose work component
is below the national average.
(§ 412)
Provides a 5 percent bonus payment for physician services
furnished between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007
by a primary care physician in a primary care scarcity
county or by a specialist physician in a specialist scarcity
county. The Secretary is authorized to designate those
rural areas where physicians can qualify for the bonus
payment. (§ 413) |
| E&M Documentation |
The Secretary is required to amend the documentation guidelines
for evaluation and management (E&M) services to reduce
paperwork burdens on physicians. In connection with developing
revised documentation guidelines, the Secretary must accept
input from practicing physicians of various specialties
in teaching and non-teaching settings and conduct a pilot
program to test the guidelines. This provides physicians
with a great opportunity to express their concerns over
the current E&M documentation guidelines. (§ 941) |
| Preventative Cases |
Effective Jan. 1, 2005, Medicare will cover certain screening
tests for cardiovascular disease, such as blood tests for
cholesterol level and other lipid or triglyceride levels.
Beneficiaries may not be tested more than once every two
years. (§ 612)
Also effective Jan. 1, 2005, Medicare will cover certain
laboratory screening tests (such as fasting plasma glucose
tests or other tests approved by the Secretary) for individuals
with risk factors for diabetes. (§ 613)
Physicians and other practitioners may be reimbursed
for an initial routine physical (including an EKG) for
beneficiaries who become eligible for Part B coverage
on or after Jan. 1, 2005, provided the examination occurs
within the first six months of the beneficiary's eligibility.
(§ 611) |
| Ambulance Services |
For ground ambulance payments, the Act provides a phase-in
floor using a blend of the fee schedule and regional fee
schedule plus a 1 percent increase across the board
for trips originating in urban areas and a 2 percent
increase across the board for trips originating in
rural areas for trips between July 1, 2004 and Jan. 1, 2007.
In 2010, ambulance suppliers will be paid entirely on the
national fee schedule. (§ 414)
For ground ambulance trips between July 1, 2004 and Jan.
1, 2009, suppliers will receive an increase on the mileage
on trips in excess of 50 miles. (§414)
Effective Jan. 1, 2005, the Act provides coverage of
rural air ambulance services. The Secretary is to establish
equipment and crew requirements that must be met in order
for air ambulance services to be covered. The Act prohibits
reimbursement for air ambulance services if there is a
financial or employment relationship between the person
requesting the rural air ambulance service and the entity
furnishing the ambulance service, or an entity under common
ownership with the entity furnishing the air ambulance
service, or a financial relationship between an immediate
family member of such requester and such an entity. There
is an exception to the prohibition, however, if a hospital
and the entity furnishing rural air ambulance services
are under common ownership and the remuneration paid by
the hospital to the air ambulance service is for provider-based
physician services furnished in a hospital that are reimbursed
under part A and the amount of the remuneration is unrelated
directly or indirectly to the provision of rural air ambulance
services. (§415) |
| DME |
Freezes payments through 2008 at current rates for most
items/services.
Reduces payment rates for selected items, which include
oxygen, oxygen equipment, wheelchairs, nebulizers, diabetic
supplies, hospital beds, and air mattresses, to be consistent
with rates paid under the Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program, which are generally lower than the Medicare rates.
Beginning in 2007, and starting with the largest statistical
metropolitan areas and high cost items, establishes competitive
bidding acquisition process to replace current fee schedules
for most items except inhalation drugs, parenteral nutrients
(and equipment and supplies), and Class III medical devices;
the Secretary has discretion to exempt rural or noncompetitive
areas and items for which competitive acquisition “is
not likely to result in significant savings.” In
addition, the Secretary must establish a process to continue
certain rental agreements and oxygen arrangements. (§302)
(Note that §302 requires the secretary to establish
“clinical conditions” for DME payment, including
face-to-face patient examinations and prescriptions, before
Medicare will pay for power wheelchairs and certain DMEs
determined by the Secretary to be prone to abusive practices.)
(THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE SIGNIFICANT
NEGATIVE REIMBURSEMENT IMPACTS FOR DME SUPPLIERS.) |
| Covered Outpatient Drugs (§§303-305) |
Beginning 2004, reduces reimbursement from 95 percent
of the average wholesale price (AWP) to 85 percent of AWP,
with infusion drugs excluded from the reduction.
Beginning in 2005, non-self administered drugs furnished
in connection with other Medicare covered services will
be set at 106 percent of the average sales price (ASP).
(ASP will be determined quarterly and will be based on
average sales prices for each drug, taking into account
discounts, rebates, free goods, and chargebacks.)
Beginning in 2006, a competitive acquisition process
will be phased in as an alternative to ASP reimbursement.
Under the competitive acquisition program, a single payment
amount for each drug in an area will be based upon bids
submitted and accepted. On an annual basis, physicians
and other providers will have to option to obtain covered
drugs and biologicals and seek Medicare reimbursement
under ASP, or to select a contractor responsible for delivering
covered drugs and biologicals to the physician. The contractor
supplying the physician will submit the claim for the
drug after it is administered, with Medicare payment and
beneficiary cost sharing amounts made directly to the
contractor.
(THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE SIGNIFICANT
NEGATIVE REIMBURSEMENT IMPACTS) |
| Hospital Outpatient PPS Drugs (§§621,
622) |
Ties payment rates to AWP for 2004-2006 that range anywhere
from 46 percent to 95 percent of AWP depending on whether
the drug is a sole-source, multi-source, or innovator drug;
in 2006, payment rates will be tied to the ASP. (THE
ABOVE CHANGE IS EXPECTED TO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE
REIMBURSEMENT IMPACT) Reduces the threshold for
separate APC payment from $150 to $50 to allow unbundling
of more drugs.
|
| Physician Services in CAHs |
Removes requirement that physicians and other health care
providers assign billing rights to a CAH. However, the CAH
will receive payment based on 115 percent of the Medicare
Physician Fee Schedule for these providers’ services
if they reassign their billing rights to the CAH. (§405). |
| Outpatient PPS |
Extends hold harmless protection to small rural hospitals
(less than 100 beds) and sole community hospitals through
2005 from payment reductions resulting from the hospital
OPPS reimbursement system. (§411) |
| ESRD Services |
Increases composite rate for renal dialysis facilities
by 1.6 percent in 2005. (§623)
Restores composite rate exception for facilities that
treat primarily pediatric dialysis patients. |
| Moratorium on Therapy Cap |
The Act reinstitutes a two-year moratorium on the annual
payment limits for physical, occupational and speech therapy
services provided by non-hospital providers. The cap, originally
set at $1,500 per calendar year, does not apply to services
furnished from the date of the Act through calendar year
2005. (§ 624) |
| Mammography Services |
Screening mammography services furnished in hospital outpatient
departments are excluded from the outpatient department
fee schedule and paid under the higher rates in the physician
fee schedule. (§614)
Diagnostic mammography services furnished in hospital
outpatient departments are similarly excluded from the
OPD fee schedule beginning Jan. 1, 2005. |
| ASC Payments |
Beginning April 2004, there is a 1 percent reduction in
payments for services furnished in ASCs. Then, from the
last quarter 2005 through 2009, ASC payments are frozen
at the then-current rate. (§ 626)
The Act requires that the GAO conduct a study that compares
the relative costs of procedures furnished in ambulatory
surgical centers to the relative costs of procedures furnished
in hospital outpatient departments and that examines how
accurately ambulatory payment categories reflect procedures
furnished in ambulatory surgical centers. This study is
to be conducted in 2004, with the GAO's report due to
Congress by Jan. 1, 2005.
Between Jan. 1, 2006 and Jan. 1, 2008, the Secretary
is to implement a revised payment system for payment of
surgical services furnished in ambulatory surgical centers
after taking into account recommendations from the GAO
study. |
| Laboratory Fee Schedule |
Freezes payment updates to the CPI under the clinical
laboratory fee schedule between 2004 and 2008. (§ 628) |
| Home Health Rural Add-On |
Extends add-on payment for services furnished to rural
area residents from April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005, but
reduces the add-on percentage from 10 percent to 5 percent.
(§421) (Above change is expected to have a significant
positive reimbursement impact.) |
| MEDICAID |
| Medicaid DSH |
Increases 2004 state allotments by 16 percent, and bumps
up the allotment for low DSH states (that spend less than
3 percent of state Medicaid expenditures on DSH) annually
through 2008.
Imposes stricter reporting requirements to ensure state
compliance with payment formulas. |
| Emergency Services for Undocumented Aliens |
Beginning 2005 and through 2008, makes providers eligible
for direct payment from the Secretary for emergency services
furnished to undocumented aliens (§1011); this could
serve to relieve hospitals from increasing uncompensated
care resulting from EMTALA requirements. |
| MISCELLANEOUS |
| Criminal Background Checks for Long-Term Care
Workers |
Section 307 of the Bill introduces a new “Pilot”
program that will require certain prospective employees
working for long-term care providers in participating states
to undergo criminal background checks. The requirement applies
to long-term care workers who directly assist nursing home
residents or patients. The Medicare Bill defines “direct
patient access employee” to include “any individual
(other than a volunteer) that has access to a patient or
resident of a long-term care facility or provider through
employment or through a contract with such facility or provider.”
The definition of “long-term care facility”
includes: (1) skilled nursing facilities, (2) nursing facilities,
(3) home health agencies, (4) providers of hospice care,
(5) long-term care hospitals, (6) providers of personal
care services, (7) residential care providers that arrange
for or directly provide long-term care services, and (8)
intermediate care facilities for the mentally disabled.
Employers who deny employment to applicants after reasonably
relying on the information in the background check “shall
not be liable in any action brought by the individual based
on the employment determination resulting from the information.” |
Providers with questions about how these payment provisions
and forthcoming CMS guidance may affect their facilities, or
how to comply with the associated regulatory requirements, can
contact Susan Fine and
Lisa Hayward in the
Health
Law Group of the Seattle office of Davis Wright Tremaine.
Questions concerning the employee criminal background provision
in the Act, and other health care employment matters, should
be directed to Amy Koziak
in the firm’s Labor
and Employment Group.
For further information, please contact:
Lisa
Rediger Hayward, Seattle, (206) 628-7666, lisahayward@dwt.com
This Health Law Advisory is a publication
of the Health Law Group of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. Our purpose
in publishing this Advisory is to inform our clients and friends
of developments in health care law. It is not intended, nor
should it be used, as a substitute for specific legal advice
as legal counsel may only be given in response to inquiries
regarding particular situations.
Copyright © 2003, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
return to Advisory
Bulletins main page
|