|
III. Conclusion
Just as immunizations are given to patients to prevent them from
becoming ill, physician practices may view the implementation of
a voluntary compliance program as comparable to a form of preventive
medicine for the practice. This voluntary compliance program guidance
is intended to assist physician practices in developing and implementing
internal controls and procedures that promote adherence to Federal
health care program requirements.
As stated earlier, physician compliance programs do not need to
be time or resource intensive and can be developed in a manner that
best reflects the nature of each individual practice. Many of the
recommendations set forth in this document are ones that many physician
practices already have in place and are simply good business practices
that can be adhered to with a reasonable amount of effort. By implementing
an effective compliance program, appropriate for its size and resources,
and making compliance principles an active part of the practice
culture, a physician practice can help prevent and reduce erroneous
or fraudulent conduct in its practice. These efforts can also streamline
and improve the business operations within the practice and therefore
innoculate itself against future problems.
Dated: September 27, 2000. June Gibbs Brown, Inspector General.
Endnotes
For the purpose of this
guidance, the term "physician" is defined as: (1) a doctor
of medicine or osteopathy; (2) a doctor of dental surgery or of
dental medicine; (3) a podiatrist; (4) an optometrist; or (5) a
chiropractor, all of whom must be appropriately licensed by the
State. 42 U.S.C. 1395x(r).
Much of this guidance
can also apply to other independent practitioners, such as psychologists,
physical therapists, speech language pathologists, and occupational
therapists.
Currently, the OIG has
issued compliance program guidance for the following eight industry
sectors: hospitals, clinical laboratories, home health agencies,
durable medical equipment suppliers, third-party medical billing
companies, hospices, Medicare+Choice organizations offering coordinated
care plans, and nursing facilities. The guidance listed here and
referenced in this document is available on the OIG web site at
http://www.hhs.gov/oig
in the Electronic Reading Room or by calling the OIG Public Affairs
office at (202) 619-1343.
The OIG has issued Advisory
Opinions responding to specific inquiries concerning the application
of the OIG's authorities, in particular, the anti-kickback statute,
and Special Fraud Alerts setting forth activities that raise legal
and enforcement issues. These documents, as well as reports from
the OIG's Office of Audit Services and Office of Evaluation and
Inspections can be obtained via the Internet address or phone number
provided in Footnote 3. Physician practices can also review the
Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) web site on the Internet
at http:// www.hcfa.gov,
for up-to-date regulations, manuals, and program memoranda related
to the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
31
U.S.C. 3729.
42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a.
See Appendix D.II. referencing
the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol for information on how to
conduct a baseline audit.
Physician practices with
laboratories or arrangements with third-party billing companies
can also check the risk areas included in the OIG compliance program
guidance for those industries.
The OIG and HCFA are working
to compile a list of basic documents issued by both entities that
could be included in such a binder. We expect to complete this list
later this fall, and will post it on the OIG and HCFA web sites,
as well as publicize this list to physician organizations and representatives
(information on how to contact the OIG is contained in Footnote
3; HCFA information can be obtained at www.hcfa.gov/medlearn
or by calling 1-800-MEDICARE).
Physician practices seeking
additional guidance on potential risk areas can review the OIG's
Work Plan to identify vulnerabilities and risk areas on which the
OIG will focus in the future. In addition, physician practices can
also review the OIG's semiannual reports, which identify program
vulnerabilities and risk areas that the OIG has targeted during
the preceding six months. All of these documents are available on
the OIG's webpage at http://
www.hhs.gov/oig.
Appendix A of this document
lists additional risk areas that a physician practice may want to
review and incorporate into their practice standards and procedures.
For example, Dr. X, an
ophthalmologist, billed for laser surgery he did not perform. As
one element of proof, he did not even have laser equipment or access
to such equipment at the place of service designated on the claim
form where he performed the surgery.
Billing for services,
supplies and equipment that are not reasonable and necessary involves
seeking reimbursement for a service that is not warranted by a patient's
documented medical condition. See 42
U.S.C. 1395i(a)(1)(A) ("no payment may be made under part
A or part B [of Medicare] for any expenses incurred for items or
services which * * * are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis
or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning
of the malformed body member"). See also Appendix A for further
discussion on this topic.
Double billing occurs
when a physician bills for the same item or service more than once
or another party billed the Federal health care program for an item
or service also billed by the physician. Although duplicate billing
can occur due to simple error, the knowing submission of duplicate
claims--which is sometimes evidenced by systematic or repeated double
billing--can create liability under criminal, civil, and/or administrative
law.
For example, Dr. Y bills
Medicare using a covered office visit code when the actual service
was a non-covered annual physical. Physician practices should remember
that "necessary" does not always constitute "covered"
and that this example is a misrepresentation of services to the
Federal health care programs.
An example of this is
when the practice bills for a service performed by Dr. B, who has
not yet been issued a Medicare provider number, using Dr. A's Medicare
provider number. Physician practices need to bill using the correct
Medicare provider number, even if that means delaying billing until
the physician receives his/her provider number.
Unbundling is the practice
of a physician billing for multiple components of a service that
must be included in a single fee. For example, if dressings and
instruments are included in a fee for a minor procedure, the provider
may not also bill separately for the dressings and instruments.
A modifier, as defined
by the CPT-4 manual, provides the means by which a physician practice
can indicate a service or procedure that has been performed has
been altered by some specific circumstance, but not changed in its
definition or code. Assuming the modifier is used correctly and
appropriately, this specificity provides the justification for payment
for those services. For correct use of modifiers, the physician
practice should reference the appropriate sections of the Medicare
Provider Manual. See Medicare Carrier
Manual Section 4630. For general information on the correct
use of modifiers, a physician practice can consult the National
Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI). See Appendix F for information
on how to download the NCCI edits. The NCCI coding edits are updated
on a quarterly basis and are used to process claims and determine
payments to physicians.
This is the practice
of coding/charging one or two middle levels of service codes exclusively,
under the philosophy that some will be higher, some lower, and the
charges will average out over an extended period (in reality, this
overcharges some patients while undercharging others).
Upcoding is billing for
a more expensive service than the one actually performed. For example,
Dr. X intentionally bills at a higher evaluation and management
(E&M) code than what he actually renders to the patient.
The official coding guidelines
are promulgated by HCFA, the National Center for Health Statistics,
the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association
and the American Health Information Management Association. See
International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical
Modification (ICD-9 CM)(and its successors); 1998 Health Care Financing
Administration Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) (and its successors);
and Physicians' CPT. In addition, there are specialized coding systems
for specific segments of the health care industry. Among these are
ADA (for dental procedures), DSM IV (psychiatric health benefits)
and DMERCs (for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics
and supplies).
The failure of a physician
practice to: (i) document items and services rendered; and (ii)
properly submit the corresponding claims for reimbursement is a
major area of potential erroneous or fraudulent conduct involving
Federal health care programs. The OIG has undertaken numerous audits,
investigations, inspections and national enforcement initiatives
in these areas.
"* * * for the diagnosis
or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning
of a malformed body member." 42 U.S.C.
1395y(a)(1)(A).
For additional information
on proper documentation, physician practices should also reference
the Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and Management Services,
published by HCFA. Currently, physicians may document based on the
1995 or 1997 E&M Guidelines, whichever is most advantageous
to the physician. A new set of draft guidelines were announced in
June 2000, and are undergoing pilot testing and revision, but are
not in current use.
The anti-kickback statute
provides criminal penalties for individuals and entities that knowingly
offer, pay, solicit, or receive bribes or kickbacks or other remuneration
in order to induce business reimbursable by Federal health care
programs. See 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b).
Civil penalties, exclusion from participation in the Federal health
care programs, and civil False Claims Act liability may also result
from a violation of the prohibition. See 42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(5), 42 U.S.C.
1320a-7(b)(7), and 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733.
The physician self-referral
law, 42 U.S.C. 1395nn (also known as
the "Stark law"), prohibits a physician from making a
referral to an entity with which the physician or any member of
the physician's immediate family has a financial relationship if
the referral is for the furnishing of designated health services,
unless the financial relationship fits into an exception set forth
in the statute or implementing regulations.
See Appendix B for additional
information on the anti-kickback statute.
The OIG's definition
of "fair market value" excludes any value attributable
to referrals of Federal program business or the ability to influence
the flow of such business. See 42 U.S.C.
1395nn(h)(3). Adhering to the rule of keeping business arrangements
at fair market value is not a guarantee of legality, but is a highly
useful general rule.
See 42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(5).
In the OIG Special Fraud
Alert "Routine Waiver
of Part B Co-payments/Deductibles" (May 1991), the OIG
describes several reasons why routine waivers of these cost-sharing
amounts pose concerns. The Alert sets forth the circumstances under
which it may be appropriate to waive these amounts. See also 42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(5).
All physician contracts
and agreements with parties in a position to influence Federal health
care program business or to whom the doctor is in such a position
to influence should be reviewed to avoid violation of the anti-kickback,
self-referral, and other relevant Federal and State laws. The OIG
has published safe harbors that define practices not subject to
the anti-kickback statute, because such arrangements would be unlikely
to result in fraud or abuse. Failure to comply with a safe harbor
provision does not make an arrangement per se illegal. Rather, the
safe harbors set forth specific conditions that, if fully met, would
assure the entities involved of not being prosecuted or sanctioned
for the arrangement qualifying for the safe harbor. One such safe
harbor applies to personal services contracts. See 42
CFR 1001.952(d).
See OIG
Special Fraud Alert "Joint Venture Arrangements" (August
1989) available on the OIG web site at http://www.hhs.gov/oig.
See also OIG Advisory Opinion
97-5.
Physician practices should
establish clear standards and procedures governing gift-giving because
such exchanges may be viewed as inducements to influence business
decisions.
There are various Federal
regulations governing the privacy of patient records and the retention
of certain types of patient records. Many states also have record
retention statutes. Practices should check with their state medical
society and/or affiliated professional association for assistance
in ascertaining these requirements for their particular specialty
and location.
The HHS-OIG "List
of Excluded Individuals/Entities" provides information to health
care providers, patients, and others regarding individuals and entities
that are excluded from participation in Federal health care programs.
This report, in both an on-line searchable and downloadable database,
can be located on the Internet at http://www.hhs.gov/oig.
The OIG sanction information is readily available to users in two
formats on over 15,000 individuals and entities currently excluded
from program participation through action taken by the OIG. The
on-line searchable database allows users to obtain information regarding
excluded individuals and entities sorted by: (1) The legal bases
for exclusions; (2) the types of individuals and entities excluded
by the OIG; and (3) the States where excluded individuals reside
or entities do business. In addition, the General Services Administration
maintains a monthly listing of debarred contractors, "List
of Parties Debarred from Federal Programs," at http://www.arnet.gov/epls.
HCFA also offers free
online training for general fraud and abuse issues at http://www.hcfa.gov/medlearn.
See Appendix F for additional information.
As noted earlier in this
guidance, another way for physician practices to receive training
is for the physicians and/or the employees of the practice to attend
training programs offered by outside entities, such as a hospital,
a local medical society or a carrier. This sort of collaborative
effort is an excellent way for the practice to meet the desired
training objective without having to expend the resources to develop
and implement in-house training.
Some publications, such
as OIG's Special Fraud Alerts, audit and inspection reports, and
Advisory Opinions are readily available from the OIG and can provide
a basis for educational courses and programs for physician practice
employees. See Appendix F for a partial listing of these documents.
See Footnote 3 for information on how to obtain copies of these
documents.
Currently, the OIG is
monitoring a significant number of corporate integrity agreements
that require many of these training elements. The OIG usually requires
a minimum of one hour annually for basic training in compliance
areas. Additional training may be necessary for specialty fields
such as claims development and billing.
Instances of noncompliance
must be determined on a case-by-case basis. The existence or amount
of a monetary loss to a health care program is not solely determinative
of whether the conduct should be investigated and reported to governmental
authorities. In fact, there may be instances where there is no readily
identifiable monetary loss to a health care provider, but corrective
actions are still necessary to protect the integrity of the applicable
program and its beneficiaries, e.g., where services required by
a plan of care are not provided.
The physician practice
may seek advice from its legal counsel to determine the extent of
the practice's liability and to plan the appropriate course of action.
The OIG has established
a Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol that encourages providers to
voluntarily report suspected fraud. The concept of voluntary self-disclosure
is premised on a recognition that the Government alone cannot protect
the integrity of the Medicare and other Federal health care programs.
Health care providers must be willing to police themselves, correct
underlying problems, and work with the Government to resolve these
matters. The Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol can be located on
the OIG's web site at: www.hhs.gov/oig.
See Appendix D for further information on the Provider Self-Disclosure
Protocol.
In addition to whatever
other method of communication is being utilized, the OIG recommends
that physician practices post the HHS-OIG Hotline telephone number
(1-800-HHS-TIPS) in a prominent area.
See Footnote 35 for information
on how to access these lists.
HCFA has recently developed
a web site which, when completed by the end of the year 2000, will
contain the LMRPs for each of the contractors across the country.
The web site can be accessed at http://www.lmrp.net.
The relevant manual provisions
are located at MCM, Part III, Secs. 7300
and 7320. This section of the manual
also includes the carrier's recommended form of an ABN.
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(a).
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(b)(1).
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(b)(2) and (3).
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(c)(1)(A).
Hospitals and physicians,
including on-call physicians, who violate the statute may face penalties
that include civil fines of up to $50,000 (or not more than $25,000
in the case of a hospital with less than 100 beds) per violation,
and physicians may be excluded from participation in the Federal
health care programs.
42
CFR 415.150 through 415.190.
42
CFR 415.174.
Id.
This section is not intended
to be and is not a complete reference for teaching physicians. It
is strongly recommended that those physicians who practice in a
teaching setting consult their respective hospitals for more guidance.
This concern is noted
in Advisory Opinion No. 98-4
and also the Office of Inspector General Compliance Program Guidance
for Third-Party Medical Billing Companies. Both are available on
the OIG web site at http://www.hhs.gov/oig.
Available through the
OIG web site at http://www.hhs.gov/oas/ratstat.html.
For the purpose of this
guidance, the term "physician" is defined as: (1) a doctor
of medicine or osteopathy; (2) a doctor of dental surgery or of
dental medicine; (3) a podiatrist; (4) an optometrist; or (5) a
chiropractor, all of whom must be appropriately licensed by the
State. 42 U.S.C. 1395x(r).
Much of this guidance
can also apply to other independent practitioners, such as psychologists,
physical therapists, speech language pathologists, and occupational
therapists.
Currently, the OIG has
issued compliance program guidance for the following eight industry
sectors: hospitals, clinical laboratories, home health agencies,
durable medical equipment suppliers, third-party medical billing
companies, hospices, Medicare+Choice organizations offering coordinated
care plans, and nursing facilities. The guidance listed here and
referenced in this document is available on the OIG web site at
http://www.hhs.gov/oig
in the Electronic Reading Room or by calling the OIG Public Affairs
office at (202) 619-1343.
The OIG has issued Advisory
Opinions responding to specific inquiries concerning the application
of the OIG's authorities, in particular, the anti-kickback statute,
and Special Fraud Alerts setting forth activities that raise legal
and enforcement issues. These documents, as well as reports from
the OIG's Office of Audit Services and Office of Evaluation and
Inspections can be obtained via the Internet address or phone number
provided in Footnote 3. Physician practices can also review the
Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) web site on the Internet
at http://www.hcfa.gov,
for up-to-date regulations, manuals, and program memoranda related
to the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
31
U.S.C. 3729.
42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a.
See Appendix D.II. referencing
the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol for information on how to
conduct a baseline audit.
Physician practices with
laboratories or arrangements with third-party billing companies
can also check the risk areas included in the OIG compliance program
guidance for those industries.
The OIG and HCFA are working
to compile a list of basic documents issued by both entities that
could be included in such a binder. We expect to complete this list
later this fall, and will post it on the OIG and HCFA web sites,
as well as publicize this list to physician organizations and representatives
(information on how to contact the OIG is contained in Footnote
3; HCFA information can be obtained at www.hcfa.gov/medlearn
or by calling 1-800-MEDICARE).
Physician practices seeking
additional guidance on potential risk areas can review the OIG's
Work Plan to identify vulnerabilities and risk areas on which the
OIG will focus in the future. In addition, physician practices can
also review the OIG's semiannual reports, which identify program
vulnerabilities and risk areas that the OIG has targeted during
the preceding six months. All of these documents are available on
the OIG's webpage at http://
www.hhs.gov/oig.
Appendix A of this document
lists additional risk areas that a physician practice may want to
review and incorporate into their practice standards and procedures.
For example, Dr. X, an
ophthalmologist, billed for laser surgery he did not perform. As
one element of proof, he did not even have laser equipment or access
to such equipment at the place of service designated on the claim
form where he performed the surgery.
Billing for services,
supplies and equipment that are not reasonable and necessary involves
seeking reimbursement for a service that is not warranted by a patient's
documented medical condition. See 42
U.S.C. 1395i(a)(1)(A) ("no payment may be made under part
A or part B [of Medicare] for any expenses incurred for items or
services which * * * are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis
or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning
of the malformed body member"). See also Appendix A for further
discussion on this topic.
Double billing occurs
when a physician bills for the same item or service more than once
or another party billed the Federal health care program for an item
or service also billed by the physician. Although duplicate billing
can occur due to simple error, the knowing submission of duplicate
claims--which is sometimes evidenced by systematic or repeated double
billing--can create liability under criminal, civil, and/or administrative
law.
For example, Dr. Y bills
Medicare using a covered office visit code when the actual service
was a non-covered annual physical. Physician practices should remember
that "necessary" does not always constitute "covered"
and that this example is a misrepresentation of services to the
Federal health care programs.
An example of this is
when the practice bills for a service performed by Dr. B, who has
not yet been issued a Medicare provider number, using Dr. A's Medicare
provider number. Physician practices need to bill using the correct
Medicare provider number, even if that means delaying billing until
the physician receives his/her provider number.
Unbundling is the practice
of a physician billing for multiple components of a service that
must be included in a single fee. For example, if dressings and
instruments are included in a fee for a minor procedure, the provider
may not also bill separately for the dressings and instruments.
A modifier, as defined
by the CPT-4 manual, provides the means by which a physician practice
can indicate a service or procedure that has been performed has
been altered by some specific circumstance, but not changed in its
definition or code. Assuming the modifier is used correctly and
appropriately, this specificity provides the justification for payment
for those services. For correct use of modifiers, the physician
practice should reference the appropriate sections of the Medicare
Provider Manual. See Medicare Carrier
Manual Section 4630. For general information on the correct
use of modifiers, a physician practice can consult the National
Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI). See Appendix F for information
on how to download the NCCI edits. The NCCI coding edits are updated
on a quarterly basis and are used to process claims and determine
payments to physicians.
This is the practice
of coding/charging one or two middle levels of service codes exclusively,
under the philosophy that some will be higher, some lower, and the
charges will average out over an extended period (in reality, this
overcharges some patients while undercharging others).
Upcoding is billing for
a more expensive service than the one actually performed. For example,
Dr. X intentionally bills at a higher evaluation and management
(E&M) code than what he actually renders to the patient.
The official coding guidelines
are promulgated by HCFA, the National Center for Health Statistics,
the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association
and the American Health Information Management Association. See
International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical
Modification (ICD-9 CM)(and its successors); 1998 Health Care Financing
Administration Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) (and its successors);
and Physicians' CPT. In addition, there are specialized coding systems
for specific segments of the health care industry. Among these are
ADA (for dental procedures), DSM IV (psychiatric health benefits)
and DMERCs (for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics
and supplies).
The failure of a physician
practice to: (i) document items and services rendered; and (ii)
properly submit the corresponding claims for reimbursement is a
major area of potential erroneous or fraudulent conduct involving
Federal health care programs. The OIG has undertaken numerous audits,
investigations, inspections and national enforcement initiatives
in these areas.
"* * * for the diagnosis
or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning
of a malformed body member." 42
U.S.C. 1395y(a)(1)(A).
For additional information
on proper documentation, physician practices should also reference
the Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and Management Services,
published by HCFA. Currently, physicians may document based on the
1995 or 1997 E&M Guidelines, whichever is most advantageous
to the physician. A new set of draft guidelines were announced in
June 2000, and are undergoing pilot testing and revision, but are
not in current use.
The anti-kickback statute
provides criminal penalties for individuals and entities that knowingly
offer, pay, solicit, or receive bribes or kickbacks or other remuneration
in order to induce business reimbursable by Federal health care
programs. See 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b).
Civil penalties, exclusion from participation in the Federal health
care programs, and civil False Claims Act liability may also result
from a violation of the prohibition. See 42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(5), 42 U.S.C.
1320a-7(b)(7), and 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733.
The physician self-referral
law, 42 U.S.C. 1395nn (also known as
the "Stark law"), prohibits a physician from making a
referral to an entity with which the physician or any member of
the physician's immediate family has a financial relationship if
the referral is for the furnishing of designated health services,
unless the financial relationship fits into an exception set forth
in the statute or implementing regulations.
See Appendix B for additional
information on the anti-kickback statute.
The OIG's definition
of "fair market value" excludes any value attributable
to referrals of Federal program business or the ability to influence
the flow of such business. See 42 U.S.C.
1395nn(h)(3). Adhering to the rule of keeping business arrangements
at fair market value is not a guarantee of legality, but is a highly
useful general rule.
See 42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(5).
In the OIG Special Fraud
Alert "Routine Waiver
of Part B Co-payments/Deductibles" (May 1991), the OIG
describes several reasons why routine waivers of these cost-sharing
amounts pose concerns. The Alert sets forth the circumstances under
which it may be appropriate to waive these amounts. See also 42
U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(5).
All physician contracts
and agreements with parties in a position to influence Federal health
care program business or to whom the doctor is in such a position
to influence should be reviewed to avoid violation of the anti-kickback,
self-referral, and other relevant Federal and State laws. The OIG
has published safe harbors that define practices not subject to
the anti-kickback statute, because such arrangements would be unlikely
to result in fraud or abuse. Failure to comply with a safe harbor
provision does not make an arrangement per se illegal. Rather, the
safe harbors set forth specific conditions that, if fully met, would
assure the entities involved of not being prosecuted or sanctioned
for the arrangement qualifying for the safe harbor. One such safe
harbor applies to personal services contracts. See 42
CFR 1001.952(d).
See OIG
Special Fraud Alert "Joint Venture Arrangements" (August
1989) available on the OIG web site at http://www.hhs.gov/oig.
See also OIG Advisory Opinion
97-5.
Physician practices should
establish clear standards and procedures governing gift-giving because
such exchanges may be viewed as inducements to influence business
decisions.
There are various Federal
regulations governing the privacy of patient records and the retention
of certain types of patient records. Many states also have record
retention statutes. Practices should check with their state medical
society and/or affiliated professional association for assistance
in ascertaining these requirements for their particular specialty
and location.
The HHS-OIG "List
of Excluded Individuals/Entities" provides information to health
care providers, patients, and others regarding individuals and entities
that are excluded from participation in Federal health care programs.
This report, in both an on-line searchable and downloadable database,
can be located on the Internet at http://www.hhs.gov/oig.
The OIG sanction information is readily available to users in two
formats on over 15,000 individuals and entities currently excluded
from program participation through action taken by the OIG. The
on-line searchable database allows users to obtain information regarding
excluded individuals and entities sorted by: (1) The legal bases
for exclusions; (2) the types of individuals and entities excluded
by the OIG; and (3) the States where excluded individuals reside
or entities do business. In addition, the General Services Administration
maintains a monthly listing of debarred contractors, "List
of Parties Debarred from Federal Programs," at http://www.arnet.gov/epls.
HCFA also offers free
online training for general fraud and abuse issues at http://www.hcfa.gov/medlearn.
See Appendix F for additional information.
As noted earlier in this
guidance, another way for physician practices to receive training
is for the physicians and/or the employees of the practice to attend
training programs offered by outside entities, such as a hospital,
a local medical society or a carrier. This sort of collaborative
effort is an excellent way for the practice to meet the desired
training objective without having to expend the resources to develop
and implement in-house training.
Some publications, such
as OIG's Special Fraud Alerts, audit and inspection reports, and
Advisory Opinions are readily available from the OIG and can provide
a basis for educational courses and programs for physician practice
employees. See Appendix F for a partial listing of these documents.
See Footnote 3 for information on how to obtain copies of these
documents.
Currently, the OIG is
monitoring a significant number of corporate integrity agreements
that require many of these training elements. The OIG usually requires
a minimum of one hour annually for basic training in compliance
areas. Additional training may be necessary for specialty fields
such as claims development and billing.
Instances of noncompliance
must be determined on a case-by-case basis. The existence or amount
of a monetary loss to a health care program is not solely determinative
of whether the conduct should be investigated and reported to governmental
authorities. In fact, there may be instances where there is no readily
identifiable monetary loss to a health care provider, but corrective
actions are still necessary to protect the integrity of the applicable
program and its beneficiaries, e.g., where services required by
a plan of care are not provided.
The physician practice
may seek advice from its legal counsel to determine the extent of
the practice's liability and to plan the appropriate course of action.
The OIG has established
a Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol that encourages providers to
voluntarily report suspected fraud. The concept of voluntary self-disclosure
is premised on a recognition that the Government alone cannot protect
the integrity of the Medicare and other Federal health care programs.
Health care providers must be willing to police themselves, correct
underlying problems, and work with the Government to resolve these
matters. The Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol can be located on
the OIG's web site at: www.hhs.gov/oig. See Appendix D for further
information on the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol.
In addition to whatever
other method of communication is being utilized, the OIG recommends
that physician practices post the HHS-OIG Hotline telephone number
(1-800-HHS-TIPS) in a prominent area.
See Footnote 35 for information
on how to access these lists.
HCFA has recently developed
a web site which, when completed by the end of the year 2000, will
contain the LMRPs for each of the contractors across the country.
The web site can be accessed at http://www.lmrp.net.
The relevant manual provisions
are located at MCM, Part III, Secs. 7300
and 7320. This section of the manual
also includes the carrier's recommended form of an ABN.
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(a).
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(b)(1).
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(b)(2) and (3).
See 42
U.S.C. 1395dd(c)(1)(A).
Hospitals and physicians,
including on-call physicians, who violate the statute may face penalties
that include civil fines of up to $50,000 (or not more than $25,000
in the case of a hospital with less than 100 beds) per violation,
and physicians may be excluded from participation in the Federal
health care programs.
42
CFR 415.150 through 415.190.
42
CFR 415.174.
Id.
This section is not intended
to be and is not a complete reference for teaching physicians. It
is strongly recommended that those physicians who practice in a
teaching setting consult their respective hospitals for more guidance.
This concern is noted
in Advisory Opinion No. 98-4
and also the Office of Inspector General Compliance Program Guidance
for Third-Party Medical Billing Companies. Both are available on
the OIG web site at http://www.hhs.gov/oig.
Available through the
OIG web site at
http://www.hhs.gov/oas/ratstat.html.
|