Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Advisories
Media & Entertainment

Entertainment Companies Beware: California Supreme Court Affirms Ban on “Limited” Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreements

By Camilo Echavarria, Henry J. Tashman
08.25.08
Share
Print this page

In August 2008, California's Supreme Court rejected the use of noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions in the context of an employment relationship in Edwards v. Arthur Anderson LLP. As a result of the decision in Edwards, the only exceptions to the rule that noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions are illegal are (a) for contracts involving the sale of a business or shares of stock in a corporation, or (b) for provisions that are necessary to protect confidential, proprietary and trade secret information.

In light of the Edwards decision, media and entertainment companies should carefully review their California-based agreements for both their talent and executives who are located in California to ensure that they come under one of the two exceptions noted above.

Noncompetition agreements for California employees which do not come under one of the two above exceptions—regardless of their limited scope or duration—are void, and an attempt to include and/or enforce these types of provisions may expose the employer to liability under the unfair competition laws of California. The Supreme Court found in Edwards that an employer that requires employees to sign an agreement containing such a clause may commit an unlawful business practice and may otherwise be subject to tort damages. For a further discussion on the Edwards decision, see the advisory from Davis Wright Tremaine's Employment Law Group.

It is important to note that most states permit noncompetition agreements which are reasonable and limited in their scope, time and geographic reach; thus, an employer should review that state's law before requiring those types of agreements. Where there are sufficient non-California contacts, it may be possible to avoid application of California law by contractual choice of law and venue provisions.

However, as of Aug. 6, 2008, New York law is now similar to California law for some media and entertainment industries. New York just passed the Broadcast Employees Freedom to Work Act, which specifically prohibits noncompetition agreements with employees in the television, radio and cable industries. See A.2124-A John/S.2393-A Leibell. For additional information, also see the press release issued by the New York State Governor's Office.

Related Articles

03.19.25
Insights
Education
New Administration Outlook: Trump's DOE Letters and Colleges' First Amendment Defenses Against Pretextual Title VI Threats Read More
03.10.25
Insights
Media & Entertainment
Lights, Camera, Legislation: Are Your Entertainment Contracts AI Ready? Read More
02.11.25
Insights
Advertising, Marketing & Promotions
New Administration Outlook: A Return to Regulatory Humility? What Advertisers Can Expect From the FTC Read More
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO
SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.