Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Insights

Access Costs Covered as "Property Damage" Under CGL Policy

By John Parnass
10.28.08
Share
Print this page
This new coverage case arose from a condo project with poorly installed siding that caused rot, mold and water damage to portions of the interior.  The siding sub was insured by Mutual of Enunclaw (MOE) which defended under reservation of rights.  After mediation, the siding sub settled for $3.3 million and a customary assignment of its coverage claims against MOE.  The trial court approved the settlement as reasonable, rejecting MOE's various claims that the sum was excessive (i.e., MOE contended that a "spot" or "surgical" repair was sufficient compared to plaintiffs' repair scope of stripping and re-siding the building). On appeal, MOE sought to raise a defense to its insured's liability (specifically, a statute of limitations defense) that had not been fully litigated prior to the settlement.  The Supreme Court held that the insurer is not entitled to raise the issue anew, since it was "considered in the liability case and the parties reached a settlement which was judicially approved as reasonable." The Court also considered MOE's claim that while some interior walls were damaged by water, the the siding itself was largely undamaged and therefore the cost to remove and replace the siding itself should be excluded.  Agreeing with the 9th Circuit's 2002 Dewitt case, the Court held the re-siding costs were covered because "removing and repairing the siding is simply part of the cost of repairing the damage to the interior walls."  Copy of opinion also available here Download file

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO

SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking "accept" you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.