Skip to content
DWT logo
People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers
Search
People
Expertise
Insights
About
Locations
Careers
Search
Advisories

EPA Settlement under Audit Policy Encourages Buyers' Compliance

By  Lawrence B. Burke, REA, and James P. Walsh
04.23.09
Share
Print this page

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced this month the largest settlement ever under its audit policy, which was launched in 1995. The policy provides incentives to companies that voluntarily discover, promptly disclose and expeditiously correct environmental violations. Companies must also take steps to prevent future violations. EPA may reduce or waive certain penalties if the facility meets the policy conditions.

In August 2008, EPA announced a national interim audit policy for new owners designed to encourage them to make a “clean start” at their recently acquired facilities. Acting on the interim policy, Invista, a multinational manufacturer of a wide range of polymer-based fibers, including Lycra, Stainmaster, and Coolmax, disclosed more than 680 violations of water, air, hazardous waste, emergency planning and preparedness, and pesticide regulations to EPA. Invista made the disclosures after auditing 12 facilities it acquired from DuPont in 2004.
 
Invista will pay a $1.7 million civil penalty and spend up to an estimated $500 million to correct the self-reported environmental violations. Consistent with the audit policy, EPA waived a large portion of the penalty in this case.

The April 13, 2009, consent decree is subject to court approval after a 30-day public comment period and approval by the federal court. A copy is available on the Justice Department’s Web site.

Although Davis Wright Tremaine was not involved in this settlement, Lynn Manolopoulos, a Davis Wright Tremaine attorney who has experience successfully managing complex nationwide audits under this policy, has noted, "The commitment of EPA to make this work is continuing under the Obama administration, and with the increased risk of regulatory enforcement, regulated parties with compliance concerns should seriously consider engaging counsel to determine if an audit is right for their situation."

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
NAVIGATE
Home People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers Events Blogs
STAY CONNECTED

Subscribe to stay informed.

Subscribe
Employees
DWT Collaborate
EEO
Affiliations
Legal notices
Privacy policy
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking “accept” you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.