Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Advisories

EPA Settlement under Audit Policy Encourages Buyers' Compliance

By Lawrence B. Burke, REA, and James P. Walsh
04.23.09
Share
Print this page

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced this month the largest settlement ever under its audit policy, which was launched in 1995. The policy provides incentives to companies that voluntarily discover, promptly disclose and expeditiously correct environmental violations. Companies must also take steps to prevent future violations. EPA may reduce or waive certain penalties if the facility meets the policy conditions.

In August 2008, EPA announced a national interim audit policy for new owners designed to encourage them to make a “clean start” at their recently acquired facilities. Acting on the interim policy, Invista, a multinational manufacturer of a wide range of polymer-based fibers, including Lycra, Stainmaster, and Coolmax, disclosed more than 680 violations of water, air, hazardous waste, emergency planning and preparedness, and pesticide regulations to EPA. Invista made the disclosures after auditing 12 facilities it acquired from DuPont in 2004.
 
Invista will pay a $1.7 million civil penalty and spend up to an estimated $500 million to correct the self-reported environmental violations. Consistent with the audit policy, EPA waived a large portion of the penalty in this case.

The April 13, 2009, consent decree is subject to court approval after a 30-day public comment period and approval by the federal court. A copy is available on the Justice Department’s Web site.

Although Davis Wright Tremaine was not involved in this settlement, Lynn Manolopoulos, a Davis Wright Tremaine attorney who has experience successfully managing complex nationwide audits under this policy, has noted, "The commitment of EPA to make this work is continuing under the Obama administration, and with the increased risk of regulatory enforcement, regulated parties with compliance concerns should seriously consider engaging counsel to determine if an audit is right for their situation."

Related Articles

2025
Feature
Financial Services
New Administration Outlook: Helping You Navigate Post-Election Uncertainty in 2025 and Beyond Read More External Link
06.06.25
Insights
Food + Beverage
Food Venture Financing News - Weekly Issue No. 239 Read More
06.05.25
Insights
Brand Protection & Advertising
Stay ADvised: 2025, Issue 11 Read More
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO
SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.