Skip to content
DWT logo
People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers
Search
People
Expertise
Insights
About
Locations
Careers
Search
Advisories
Energy

April 2 is Deadline for Written Comments on Proposed EFSC Rulemaking on Permitting

By  Peter A. Sergienko and Richard M. Glick
03.24.10
Share
Print this page

The Oregon Natural Desert Association, Audubon Society of Portland, and Defenders of Wildlife have petitioned the Oregon Department of Energy (DOE) seeking to amend Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 345-001-0010 to include a comprehensive definition of "Single Energy Facility." The proposed definition is long and complex, but in essence, it would make energy facilities with common geography and infrastructure, but built over time, “single facilities” for permitting purposes.

The proposed rule would also place the burden of proof on developers of renewable energy projects under 35 average megawatts seeking a conditional use permit from a local government to demonstrate that the proposed facility is not a "Single Energy Facility" within the proposed definition. This provision would force more wind, solar and geothermal project developers into the state Energy Facility Siting Council (EFSC) permitting process.

Indeed, the environmental groups’ petition specifically cites the Echanis, East Ridge and West Ridge facilities in Harney County as an example of three facilities permitted under county land use procedures that should have been considered a single facility and permitted under the EFSC permitting process in order to better consider potential environmental impacts, particularly to protected species.

The next steps in the EFSC process are to seek and review public comments and to decide whether to undertake the proposed rulemaking. EFSC has just issued a notice to interested persons that it will be receiving written comments on the environmental groups’ petition through April 2, 2010, and, additionally, that it will receive oral comments at its next meeting on April 30, 2010. EFSC must make its decision to conduct the rulemaking by May 6, 2010.

If you have questions or would like assistance in preparing and submitting written comments on the proposed rulemaking please contact your Davis Wright Tremaine lawyer or one of the authors.

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
NAVIGATE
Home People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers Events Blogs
STAY CONNECTED

Subscribe to stay informed.

Subscribe
Employees
DWT Collaborate
EEO
Affiliations
Legal notices
Privacy policy
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking “accept” you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.