Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Insights

One Policy Limit or More? Division 1 Interprets Anti-Stacking Clause

04.21.10
Share
Print this page

Here is Division 1's most recent analysis on the arcane but important issue of how many policy limits are available in a situation where a carrier issues multiple year-to-year CGL policies and the insured becomes legally obligated to pay for damage that occurs over those multiple year but results from the same continuous or repeated cause (i.e., water seepage). 

The answer, at least in this case with this policy language was:  1 policy limit, under the clause known as the anti-stacking provision.

Copy of opinion also available here Download file

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO

SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking "accept" you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.