Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Insights

No Race to Judgment on Bond Claims

05.24.10
Share
Print this page

On May 24, 2010, Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals held that where two claimants against a specialty contractor's bond have the same statutory priority, the first of the claimants does not gain priority by being the first to reduce the claim to judgment.  The case, Hosea v. Toth, can be viewed here:  Download file

In Hosea, two residential owners brought claims against the same specialty contractor, including claims against the contractor's bond.  One owner obtained judgment before the other, and moved to have the entire bond of $6,000 distributed to him based upon the fact he had been the first to obtain judgment on his claim.  The trial court agreed.  In this decision, the Court of Appeals reversed, finding that the statutory scheme does not sanction such a "race to judgment."  The Court of Appeals did not address how the bond sum should be distributed -- per capita or pro rata pursuant to the respective size of each claimant's claim.

Related Articles

2025
Feature
Financial Services
New Administration Outlook: Helping You Navigate Post-Election Uncertainty in 2025 and Beyond Read More External Link
06.06.25
Insights
Food + Beverage
Food Venture Financing News - Weekly Issue No. 239 Read More
06.05.25
Insights
Brand Protection & Advertising
Stay ADvised: 2025, Issue 11 Read More
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO
SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.