Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Presentations
Healthcare

"Drafting Perils and Pitfalls: How Stark has Changed the Risk Calculus," Emerging Issues in Healthcare Law 13th Annual Conference, American Bar Association, San Diego

By   Robert G. Homchick
02.22.12
Share
Print this page

With the ever-increasing emphasis on compliance and new understanding of CMS’ interpretation of the Stark Law coming out of the self-disclosure protocol, health lawyers should reconsider the wisdom of direct contractual obligations, penalty clauses, cost of living adjustments, evergreen provisions and complex compensation or expense formulae when creating contractual relationships -- what used to be a “best practice” may now be a trap for the unwary.

Questions addressed included:

  • What are the pros and cons of direct versus indirect financial relationships?
  • How to balance complexity versus practicality?
  • When should you sacrifice precision for ease of implementation?
  • Are evergreen clauses a good or bad idea?
  • Are the six-month holdover provision and temporary noncompliance exception enough to save an arrangement?
  • Late fees and other penalties – are they worth it?

Related Articles

06.13.25
Insights
Healthcare
Oregon SB 951: New Restrictions on the Corporate Practice of Medicine in Oregon Read More
05.22.25
Insights
White Collar, Investigations & Government Controversies
DOJ Criminal Division Reveals New White-Collar Crime Enforcement Priorities and Corporate Enforcement Policies Read More
05.20.25
Presentations
Healthcare
Healthcare Industry Summit 2025 Read More
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO
SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.