Robert G. Scott Jr.
Partner
Bob Scott helps broadband cable, telecommunications, wireless, and internet service providers secure rights to construct and maintain their networks over public and private rights of way and multi-tenant properties. He further assists clients with transactions affecting their communications networks, including regulatory approvals (franchises, licenses, and permits), programming agreements, pole attachments, agreements for servicing commercial and private real estate interests, sale and acquisition of businesses, and consumer notices and disclosures. Bob also advises clients on the myriad federal and state regulations affecting providers of internet access, cable television and telecommunications services.
Bob has deep experience as lead counsel in disputes across the country involving cable and telecommunications franchising, government fees on internet services, federal preemption of state and local laws, competitive pricing and antitrust, First Amendment rights, access to public and private rights of way, and pole attachments. He likewise helps clients resolve disputes involving cable system must-carry, copyright, unfair competition, trade secrets, real estate, and corporate and partnership contract disputes.
Counseling & Transactional
Communications
- Cable, telecommunications and ISP local franchising, state and local review of system sales and acquisitions, competitive pricing and discounts, state and local permitting, franchise fees, utility taxes, customer terms and conditions, customer notices, cable compulsory copyright, cable system EEO, and network use of utility and railroad rights-of-way
- Cable, telecommunications and technology agreements, including agreements for broadband service to multi-tenant residential (MDU/MTE) and commercial properties, interconnection, wireless antenna siting, easements and utility rights of way, pole attachments, must-carry and other video program carriage, IRUs, last mile data transport
Media and First Amendment
Litigation
Metronet v. City of Colorado Springs
Lead counsel for Metronet challenging a city's prohibition on Metronet's ability to install its fiber network in existing utility easements as a violation of Section 253 of the federal Communications Act and other laws (D. Colo. 2025)
Verizon v. XO Communications
Defend broadband services provider against claims of breach of contract for service to planned community
Defend broadband services provider against claims of breach of contract and federal preemption
Defend national ISP against claims for Internet access service fees
Admitted to Practice
- District of Columbia
- Virginia
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit
- U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
- U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
- U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
- U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
- U.S. District Court, Western District of Virginia
Education
- J.D., William & Mary School of Law
- B.A., James Madison University, with honors
Memberships & Affiliations
- American Bar Association
- Federal Communications Bar Association
Professional Recognition
- Named one of the "Best Lawyers in America" in Communications Law by Best Lawyers, 2021-present
- Named to "Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll" by the D.C. Court of Appeals and the D.C. Superior Court, 2017-2020; High Honors 2017
Background
- Partner, Cole, Raywid & Braverman LLP, 1996-2006
- Associate, Cole, Raywid & Braverman LLP, 1987-1995