Skip to content
DWT logo
People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers
Search
People
Expertise
Insights
About
Locations
Careers
Search
Desktop Image: Siler, Ross C.
Mobile Image: Siler, Ross C.

Ross C. Siler

Counsel

T 206.757.8120 Seattle
  •  

Download vCard Download bio Print this page
Share

Ross Siler focuses his practice on healthcare litigation and regulatory matters, government investigations, and consumer protection cases. He has represented clients in large-scale investigations and suits brought by the Washington Attorney General's Office and U.S. Attorney's Office.

Ross was part of the team that defended the Value Village thrift store chain against the Washington AG during a three-week consumer protection trial. The defense prevailed on the majority of claims and denied the state's attempt to recover unprecedented nationwide monetary relief. Ross examined multiple witnesses at trial, including the state's lead investigator.

Ross has led efforts to respond to civil investigative demands and government subpoenas. He has briefed and argued summary judgment, discovery, and pre-trial motions; deposed government representatives; prepared and defended corporate executives in depositions; and coordinated document review and production projects.

He additionally represents and advises healthcare systems and providers in a variety of matters. Ross has presented on topics at meetings of the Washington State Society of Healthcare Attorneys. Before law school, Ross worked at newspapers in California and Utah and brings his reporter's background, writing skills, and instincts to his work as a lawyer.

Practice Highlights

Healthcare litigation

Represents clients in federal False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback, and Stark law matters, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement litigation, and professional licensing investigations and complaints.

Government and internal investigations

Represents clients in responding to government investigations and subpoenas, and conducts complex internal investigations.

Consumer Protection Act cases

Experienced in cases involving Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, including CPA enforcement actions brought by the Attorney General’s Office.
Searching...

Admitted to Practice

  • Washington, 2013
  • U.S. District Court Western District of Washington, 2013
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of Washington, 2016

Education

  • J.D., University of Washington School of Law, 2013, with high honors
    • Managing Editor, Washington Law Review
    • Innocence Project Northwest
    • CALI Awards: Contracts, Constitutional Law, Payment Systems, Supreme Court Decision Making
  • B.S., Journalism, Northwestern University, 2002, cum laude

Background

    • Summer Associate, Davis Wright Tremaine, Seattle, 2012
    • Extern, Hon. David H. Armstrong, Washington Court of Appeals, Division II, Tacoma, Wash., 2011
    • Extern, Hon. Susan J. Craighead, King County Superior Court, Seattle, 2011
    • Staff Writer, The Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City, 2007-2010
    • Staff Writer, Los Angeles Daily News, Woodland Hills, Calif., 2002-2007
    • Staff Writer, The Washington Post, Washington, D.C., 2001
Clear Filter
Searching...
Your search returned no results. Please try another search or remove search criteria.
DWT logo
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
NAVIGATE
Home People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers Events Blogs
STAY CONNECTED

Subscribe to stay informed.

Subscribe
Employee Login
DWT Collaborate
EEO
Affiliations
Legal notices
Privacy policy
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking “accept” you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.