Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Advisories
Communications

FCC Adopts Revised Unbundling Rules in TRO Remand Order

12.15.04
Share
Print this page

Today the FCC approved new network unbundling rules. The FCC’s action comes in response to the D.C. Circuit’s review, and rejection, of many portions of the FCC’s previous UNE rules established in the Triennial Review Order (“TRO”).

The full FCC order has not yet been released. However, the Commission’s news release indicates that the FCC has taken the following actions:

  • The FCC further modified its "impairment" standard in an attempt to conform to the D.C. Circuit’s view of the proper way to determine when a CLEC is “impaired” without access to unbundled network elements. The FCC’s new impairment standard apparently includes the use of "inferences" regarding the prospects of competition in one market based upon competition in other markets. The precise ramifications of this new impairment standard are not yet clear, but it will likely be used as a justification to deny CLECs access to unbundled facilities in certain markets even where alternative facilities are not available. Alternatively, CLECs will benefit from the FCC’s decision to decline to find that special access is a default replacement for unbundled loops and transport. 

  • Unbundled transport: 

    • Unbundled access to DS1 transport is retained, but is not available on routes connecting wire centers "where both wire centers contain at least 4 fiber-based collocators or at least 38,000 business access lines." 

    • Unbundled access to DS3 transport is retained, but is not available on routes where both wire centers contain 3 fiber-based collocators or 24,000 business lines. 

    • Entrance facilities are no longer available on an unbundled basis. 

  • Unbundled loops: 

    • Access to DS3 loops retained, but is not available where 4 fiber-based collocators and 38,000 business lines exist. 

    • Access to DS1 loops retained, but is not available where 4 fiber-based collocators and 60,000 business lines exist.

    • Dark fiber loops are no longer available on an unbundled basis.

* Note that the test for access to unbundled loops is a conjunctive test, whereby both elements of the test must be met in order to deny CLECs access to the unbundled element. This differs from the disjunctive test the FCC will use for unbundled transport, which requires the existence of either a certain number of fiber based collocators or a certain number of business access lines.

  • Mass market switching: 

    • ILECs are no longer required to make available mass market local circuit switching. 

  • Transition period from current unbundling obligations: 

    • UNE-P: Is no longer available, but the elimination of these rules will be subject to a longer transition period (into early 2006) according to the separate statement of Chairman Powell. 

    • Existing unbundling obligations for other elements will be phased out under a 12-month, or 18-month plan, depending on specific element.

We anticipate that ILEC reaction to this decision will range from insistence upon immediate compliance with the FCC's news release to more measured responses from those still struggling with UNE amendment proceedings before state commissions. Additional details concerning the FCC’s decision will follow this Update, as they become available. In the meantime, please contact us with any questions you may have regarding this latest development.

Related Articles

01.08.25
Webinars
Communications
"Preparing for Agency Enforcement Under Trump 2: What You Need to Know," Davis Wright Tremaine Webinar Read More
09.11.24
Insights
Communications
Licensees and Telecom/Video Service Providers Must File and Pay FCC Regulatory Fees by Sept. 26, 2024 Read More
07.17.24
Insights
Communications
Will the Supreme Court's Loper Bright Decision Change How the 6th Circuit Reviews the FCC's Open Internet Order? Read More
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO
SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.