Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Advisories
Communications

Federal District Court Declares AT&T U-Verse to be Cable Service and Cable System

By Paul Glist, T. Scott Thompson
07.26.07
Share
Print this page

On July 26, 2007, the United States District Court in Connecticut rejected the claim of AT&T and the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) that AT&T’s “U-verse” system was not a cable system delivering cable services. Office of Consumer Counsel and New England Cable and Telecommunications Association v. Southern New England Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Connecticut, Inc. and Department of Public Utility Control of the State of Connecticut, Case No. 3:06cv1106 (JBA) (D. Conn., July 26, 2007).

AT&T has sought to treat its Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) system as exempt from traditional cable franchising, based upon the underlying technological architecture. Reversing last years’ Connecticut DPUC ruling that exempted AT&T as not “cable,” the court ruled that AT&T had structured its offering to include prescheduled “linear” channels (e.g., ABC) and other channels offered to all subscribers in tiers selected by AT&T, which met applicable federal definitions of cable. It rejected claims that AT&T’s offering was akin to video streaming over the public Internet, individually tailored programming, “interactive on-demand” services or information services. It also rejected claims of deference owed to the DPUC. The court ruled: “the subscriber interaction involved in AT&T’s video programming service is the same as that involved in traditional CATV programming.” It therefore held the DPUC decision preempted by federal law.

Davis Wright Tremaine represented the New England Cable and Telecommunications Association in this precedent-setting decision.

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO

SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking "accept" you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.