Skip to content
DWT logo
People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers
Search
People
Expertise
Insights
About
Locations
Careers
Search
Advisories
Communications

FCC Seeks Comment on Video Description Issues for Report to Congress

By   
06.26.13
Share
Print this page
The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Media Bureau has issued a Public Notice seeking comment on inquiries related to the video description of video programming delivered via both television and the Internet. The inquiry is designed to help the FCC fulfill obligations imposed by the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) that it report to Congress by July 1, 2014, on the status, benefits, and costs of video description. The deadline for comments is Sept. 4, 2013, with replies due Oct. 2, 2013.

As discussed in our advisory on FCC reinstatement of video description obligations under the CVAA, Commission rules require 50 hours per calendar quarter of video-described prime-time or children’s programming by commercial TV affiliates of the top 4 broadcast networks in the top 25 markets, and by MVPDs serving 50,000 or more subscribers for each of the top 5 national nonbroadcast networks they carry. The rules also impose “pass through” obligations on all network-affiliated broadcast stations regardless of market size, and on all MVPDs regardless of number of subscribers, and require that any programming aired with video descriptions retain them if re-televised on the same station or MVPD channel. The rules were first adopted in 2000 but invalidated by the D.C. Circuit in 2002 as not authorized by statute, and were reinstated as of October 2011 under the CVAA, with compliance required by July 1, 2012. The FCC also recently adopted rules requiring the availability of secondary audio streams for video description for all apparatus designed to receive, play back, or record programming transmitted simultaneously with sound, as discussed here. 

The Public Notice recites that the CVAA directs the FCC to inquire about the following specific issues related to video description on TV, and thus seeks comment on:
  • The availability, use, and benefits of video description;
  • The technical and creative issues associated with providing video description; and
  • The financial costs that providers of video programming and program owners face in providing video description.

These inquiries seek to obtain data on the amount and types of video-described programming currently available to consumers (whether done so voluntarily or to comply with FCC rules), as well as data concerning which consumers use video description and the benefits they receive, including consumers without visual disabilities. The FCC also asks whether the availability of video description is indicated in program guides (or elsewhere), and if so, whether audibly and/or through any common industry method. Additionally, the FCC seeks comment on any technical or creative issues involved in providing video-described programming—whether in the production, distribution, or viewing thereof—and on the costs of providing video description. And the Public Notice opens the door to “any other relevant legal and policy issues” pertaining to video descriptions on TV.

The Public Notice further recites that the CVAA directs the FCC to inquire into the technical and operational issues, costs, and benefits of providing video descriptions for IP video programming. It thus asks whether there are technologies or functionalities that must evolve to accommodate video-described programming on the Internet, as well as about the costs and benefits of offering video description in IP-delivered programming. Here, too, the Public Notice solicits input on “any other relevant legal and policy issues” which includes those raised in other FCC requests for comment pertaining to whether MVPDs must comply with the video description rules when permitting subscribers to access linear video programming on tablets, laptops, personal computers, smartphones, or similar devices.

As noted at the outset, the comment and reply deadlines are Sept. 4, 2013 and Oct. 2, 2013, respectively.

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
NAVIGATE
Home People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers Events Blogs
STAY CONNECTED

Subscribe to stay informed.

Subscribe
Employees
DWT Collaborate
EEO
Affiliations
Legal notices
Privacy policy
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking “accept” you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.