Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Publications
Securities & Derivative Litigation

The Question of Whether Internal Reporting Triggers Whistleblower Protection Under Dodd-Frank Remains Unsettled

By John A. Goldmark
January 2015
Share
Print this page

The 5th Circuit’s 2013 decision in Asadi v. GE Energy (USA) LLC, which limited Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower protections to those who reported to the SEC in advance of the alleged retaliation, has sharply divided the district courts, setting up the issue for a circuit split and likely eventual Supreme Court review.

In Asadi, the 5th Circuit ruled that a former GE executive, who claimed he was fired for reporting a possible securities law violation, did not qualify as a whistleblower under Dodd-Frank because he reported internally rather than to the SEC.  The court found the plain language of Dodd-Frank extends whistleblower protection only to those individuals who report securities violations “to the Commission,” and refused to give deference to a recent SEC regulation stating that internal reporting satisfies Dodd-Frank. This ruling makes Dodd-Frank stand in contrast to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, which extends whistleblower protection to individuals who claim retaliation after reporting violations internally.

Before Asadi, most district courts had found ambiguity in Dodd-Frank and relied on the SEC’s interpretation in extending protection to internal reporting (like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act does). But Asadi changed the legal landscape. District courts outside the 5th Circuit are now split, with some courts following Asadi and the plain statutory language and others finding statutory ambiguity and relying on the SEC’s expansive interpretation.

Until other circuit courts address the issue, or it is resolved by the Supreme Court, there will continue to be uncertainty about whether an employee who claims to have been fired for reporting securities violations internally can claim whistleblower protection under Dodd-Frank. 

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO
SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking "accept" you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.