NLRB Reverses Nearly 80 Years of Precedent by Declaring Captive Audience Meetings Unlawful
The Board also opted to apply its holding prospectively only and not retroactively, which is atypical. The Board acknowledged that its decision marks a significant change in nearly eight decades of precedent permitting captive audience meetings. It is possible that Amazon will appeal the decision, but until the decision is vacated or reversed, employers conducting captive audience meetings now risk violating the Act.
Bottom Line for Employers
Consistent with the Board's reasoning, allowing employees to voluntarily attend meetings scheduled to discuss an employer's views on unionization should ameliorate any impermissible coercive effect. Employers in the midst of a union organizing campaign should therefore provide advance notice and clarify that attendance at any meeting scheduled to discuss unionization is strictly voluntary. Attendance records should not be kept, and employees should be told that they are free to choose to attend or not and that no discipline or special benefit or privilege will flow from their decision either way.
This continues to be an evolving area of law. DWT will continue to monitor these and other labor law developments. Please reach out if you have questions about how the Board's decision might impact your organization.