Skip to content
DWT logo
People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers
Search
People
Expertise
Insights
About
Locations
Careers
Search
Advisories
Environmental

New Guidance on Clean Water Act Jurisdiction: Longer Federal Reach, Less Certainty

By  Richard M. Glick and Michael J. Gelardi
05.04.11
Share
Print this page

On May 2, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers jointly published new guidance on how the agencies will determine which waters and wetlands are subject to jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act.

The new guidance is the third attempt by the agencies to bring clarification from the muddled 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Rapanos. In that case, the Court gave three different approaches to jurisdiction, causing considerable uncertainty among courts, agencies, and developers.

The guidance indicates that the sweep of federal jurisdiction will grow substantially. Having received a number of unfriendly comments even before the guidance was formally published, including a letter signed by 170 members of Congress, the agencies have indicated in the guidance that a formal rulemaking will follow. Comments on the new guidance will be accepted until July 1, 2011.

For more information, please see our article “New Post-Rapanos Guidance—Longer Federal Reach, Less Certainty” to be published in the May 15 issue of The Water Report.

Related Articles

DWT logo
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
NAVIGATE
Home People Expertise Insights
About Locations Careers Events Blogs
STAY CONNECTED

Subscribe to stay informed.

Subscribe
Employees
DWT Collaborate
EEO
Affiliations
Legal notices
Privacy policy
©1996-2022 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Close
Close

CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: By clicking “accept” you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship, and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in good faith to retain us.